Criterion of embarrassment

This article is missing information about discussion of whether this is used outside of Bible history, and opinions of non-Bible scholars as to the criterion's reliability. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page. (January 2024)

The criterion of embarrassment is a type of historical analysis in which a historical account is deemed likely to be true under the inference that the author would have no reason to invent a historical account which might embarrass them. Certain Biblical scholars have used this as a metric for assessing whether the New Testament's accounts of Jesus' actions and words are historically probable.^[1]

The criterion of embarrassment is one of the criteria of authenticity used by academics, the others being the criterion of dissimilarity, the criterion of language and environment, criterion of coherence, and the criterion of multiple attestation.^[2]