Rice v. Collins

Rice v. Collins
Argued December 5, 2005
Decided January 18, 2006
Full case nameRice, Warden, et al. v. Collins
Docket no.04-52
Citations546 U.S. 333 (more)
126 S. Ct. 969; 163 L. Ed. 2d 824; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 913
Case history
PriorSuperior Court of California convicted defendant; California Court of Appeal upheld conviction, People v. Collins, No. B106939 (Dec. 12, 1997); Supreme Court of California denied petition for review; United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed with prejudice respondent's petition for a writ of habeas corpus; reversed, 348 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2003); cert. granted, 545 U.S. 1151 (2005).
Holding
Habeas corpus relief may not be granted on the basis of debatable inferences used to overturn the trial court's finding.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceBreyer, joined by Souter
Laws applied
28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)

Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge to remove a young African American woman, Juror 16, from a defendant's drug trial jury in a California court case, based on her youth and on her alleged "eye rolling" in answer to a question.[1][2][3] The defendant, Steven Martell Collins, challenged the striking of Juror 16, saying her exclusion was based on race, but the trial judge agreed that the prosecutor's reasons were race-neutral. The California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's ruling, and the Federal District Court dismissed Collins' habeas corpus petition with prejudice. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, stating that the dismissal was unreasonable based, among other reasons, on the lack of evidence that the eye rolling had occurred.[4]

  1. ^ Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 (2006). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.
  2. ^ "Foot Stomping & Eye Rolling - Effective Ways to Upset Your Parents?". Archived from the original on October 22, 2007. Retrieved October 28, 2007.
  3. ^ "Simon Cowell Defends Himself After Eye-Rolling". The San Francisco Chronicle. April 18, 2007. Retrieved October 28, 2007.
  4. ^ "Rice v. Collins". Duke Law School. Archived from the original on September 3, 2007. Retrieved October 28, 2007.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search