Argument from miracles

The argument from miracles is an argument for the existence of God that begins by asserting that there are kinds of possible events the best explanation for which would be supernatural agency. Traditionally, events of the relevant kind are known as miracles. All the argument requires is that miracles be such that the best explanations for them invoke supernatural agency.[1]

Defenders of the argument include C. S. Lewis,[2] Richard Swinburne,[3] Gary Habermas,[4] William Paley,[5] and Samuel Clarke.[6]

  1. ^ Bonevac, Daniel (2011), Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (ed.), "The Argument From Miracles", Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 3, Oxford University Press, retrieved 2025-02-21
  2. ^ Lewis, C. S. (1947). Miracles.
  3. ^ Swinburne, Richard (2003). The Resurrection of God Incarnate. Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference :1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Clarke, Samuel (1711). A Discourse Concerning the Being and Attributes of God, the Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation. Printed by W. Botham, for James Knapton, at the Crown in St. Paul's Church-Yard.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search