Azar v. Allina Health Services

Azar v. Allina Health Services
Argued January 15, 2019
Decided June 2, 2019
Full case nameAlex M. Azar II, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Allina Health Services et al.
Docket no.17-1484
Citations587 U.S. ___ (more)
139 S. Ct. 1804
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorAllina Health Servs. v. Burwell, 201 F. Supp. 3d 94 (D.D.C. 2016); reversed sub nom., Allina Health Servs. v. Price, 863 F.3d 937 (D.C. Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 51 (2018).
Holding
Because the government has not identified a lawful excuse for neglecting its statutory notice-and-comment obligations, its policy must be vacated.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
MajorityGorsuch, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan
DissentBreyer
Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Azar v. Allina Health Services, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the Department of Health and Human Services' new policy to retroactively reduce Medicare payments must be vacated due to the department's failure to uphold its notice-and-comment obligations.[1]

  1. ^ Azar v. Allina Health Services, No. 17-1484, 587 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 1804 (2019).

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search