Comparative political theory

Comparative political theory, comparative political thought,[1] or comparative political philosophy,[2] is a subfield of political theory that expands the traditional boundaries of Western-centric political philosophy to incorporate insights from non-Western traditions, indigenous philosophies, and cross-cultural dialogues.[3][4] Comparative political theory seeks to understand political concepts, ideologies, and practices across various cultural, historical, and intellectual contexts.[5][6] It also aims to create a richer, more inclusive understanding of politics by comparing and engaging with philosophical systems from diverse global traditions.[7][8]

  1. ^ Tully, James. "Deparochializing political theory and beyond: A dialogue approach to comparative political thought." Journal of World Philosophies 1, no. 5 (2016): 1-18.
  2. ^ Cline, Erin M. "Two senses of justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and comparative political philosophy." Dao 6 (2007): 361-381.
  3. ^ March, A. F. (2009). What is comparative political theory?. The Review of Politics, 71(4), 531-565.
  4. ^ Von Vacano, Diego. "The scope of comparative political theory." Annual Review of Political Science 18, no. 1 (2015): 465-480.
  5. ^ Williams, Melissa S., and Mark E. Warren. "A democratic case for comparative political theory." Political Theory 42, no. 1 (2014): 26-57.
  6. ^ Dallmayr, Fred Reinhard. Border crossings: Toward a comparative political theory. Lexington Books, 1999.
  7. ^ Dallmayr, Fred. "Introduction: toward a comparative political theory." The Review of Politics 59, no. 3 (1997): 421-428.
  8. ^ Dallmayr, Fred. "Beyond monologue: For a comparative political theory." Perspectives on Politics 2, no. 2 (2004): 249-257.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search