Direct air capture

An example of what Direct Air Capture could look like and how the process works.

Direct air capture (DAC) is the use of chemical or physical processes to extract carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the ambient air.[1] If the extracted CO2 is then sequestered in safe long-term storage, the overall process is called direct air carbon capture and sequestration (DACCS), achieving carbon dioxide removal. Systems that engage in such a process are referred to as negative emissions technologies (NET).[2]

DAC is in contrast to carbon capture and storage (CCS), which captures CO2 from point sources, such as a cement factory or a bioenergy plant.[3] After the capture, DAC generates a concentrated stream of CO2 for sequestration or utilization. Carbon dioxide removal is achieved when ambient air makes contact with chemical media, typically an aqueous alkaline solvent[4] or sorbents.[5] These chemical media are subsequently stripped of CO2 through the application of energy (namely heat), resulting in a CO2 stream that can undergo dehydration and compression, while simultaneously regenerating the chemical media for reuse.

As of 2023, DACCS has yet to be integrated into emissions trading because, at over US$1000,[6] the cost per ton of carbon dioxide is many times the carbon price on those markets.[7] The current high cost of DAC is driven by the scale of deployment and energy factors. It is reported that for DAC plant less than 50,000 tonnes CO2 per annum, like the current largest DAC plant (Climeworks Mammoth), DAC costs would exceed $1000 per tonne CO2.[8] However, for plant scales of 1 Mtpa and above, DAC cost would generally be within $94–232 per tonne of atmospheric CO2 removed.[4][8] Future innovations may reduce the energy intensity of this process.

DAC was suggested in 1999 and is still in development.[9][10] Several commercial plants are planned or in operation in Europe and the US. Large-scale DAC deployment may be accelerated when connected with economical applications or policy incentives.

In contrast to carbon capture and storage (CCS) which captures emissions from a point source such as a factory, DAC reduces the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere as a whole. Thus, DAC can be used to capture emissions that originated in non-stationary sources such as airplanes.[3]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference :4 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Quarton, Christopher J.; Samsatli, Sheila (1 January 2020). "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation" (PDF). Applied Energy. 257: 113936. Bibcode:2020ApEn..25713936Q. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113936. S2CID 208829001.
  3. ^ a b Erans, María; Sanz-Pérez, Eloy S.; Hanak, Dawid P.; Clulow, Zeynep; Reiner, David M.; Mutch, Greg A. (2022). "Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges". Energy & Environmental Science. 15 (4): 1360–1405. doi:10.1039/D1EE03523A. hdl:10115/19074. S2CID 247178548.
  4. ^ a b Keith, David W.; Holmes, Geoffrey; St. Angelo, David; Heide, Kenton (7 June 2018). "A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere". Joule. 2 (8): 1573–1594. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006.
  5. ^ Beuttler, Christoph; Charles, Louise; Wurzbacher, Jan (21 November 2019). "The Role of Direct Air Capture in Mitigation of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions". Frontiers in Climate. 1: 10. doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00010.
  6. ^ "Carbon-dioxide-removal options are multiplying". The Economist. 20 November 2023.
  7. ^ "The many prices of carbon dioxide". The Economist. 20 November 2023.
  8. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference :29 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Sanz-Pérez, Eloy S.; Murdock, Christopher R.; Didas, Stephanie A.; Jones, Christopher W. (12 October 2016). "Direct Capture of carbon dioxide from Ambient Air". Chemical Reviews. 116 (19): 11840–11876. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173. PMID 27560307.
  10. ^ "Direct Air Capture (Technology Factsheet)" (PDF). Geoengineering Monitor. 24 May 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2019. Retrieved 27 August 2019.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search