 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,745 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by Asilvering (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by Youknowwhoistheman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Youknowwhoistheman 16 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 July 2024 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 17 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 18 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 July 2024 by Youknowwhoistheman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Youknowwhoistheman 18 days ago. | |
Comment: Looks notable, from a look at the citation count on google scholar. But you need reliable sources. Here's one to start with: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181415. Please use Template:Ping to reply to AfC reviewers! Thank you. asilvering (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I could not verify most of these sources, for example, the #Reception and Influence section. Please provide links to the exact publications you're referencing. I also did further exploration but could not find the publications you're referencing. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (July 2024) |
| Author | Isma'il Raji al-Faruqi |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Subject | Islamic theology, Tawhid |
| Published | 1982 |
| Publisher | International Institute of Islamic Thought |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 367 |
| ISBN | 9780912463797 |
| OCLC | 12133143 |
Al-Tawhid: Its Implications for Thought and Life is a book by Isma'il Raji al-Faruqi, first published in 1982. The work explores the central Islamic concept of Tawhid, the oneness and unity of God, and its implications for various aspects of life and thought[1].
- ^ Al-Faruqi, Isma'il Raji (1982). Al-Tawhid: Its Implications for Thought and Life. Herndon, VA: IIIT.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search