Submission declined on 29 June 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 29 June 2025 by Itzcuauhtli11 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by Itzcuauhtli11 2 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 25 June 2025 by JacobTheRox (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by JacobTheRox 5 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 20 June 2025 by Astra Travasso (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by Astra Travasso 10 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 10 June 2025 by MCE89 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by MCE89 20 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 15 March 2025 by Velella (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Velella 3 months ago. | |
Comment: The sources are primary and therefore cannot establish notability per WP:GNG, and I don't see anything in there that would likely satisfy WP:NPROF either. To be quite frank, an early/mid career asst prof with h-index of 12 is probably just WP:TOOSOON. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Please add more secondary sources independent of the subject. Astra Travasso (talk) 13:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Unclear where notability lies. Professors at US Universities are not intrinsically notable. Only a single ref provided Velella Velella Talk 05:45, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Anahid S. Modrek | |
|---|---|
| Born | Anahid Sandaldjian Modrek September 8 |
| Alma mater | University of California, Berkeley (BA) Columbia University (PhD) |
| Occupation | Professor |
Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox person with unknown parameter "advisor"
Anahid S. Modrek (Armenian: Անահիտ Սանտալճևան մoտրէգ) is an Armenian American psychologist. She is tenure track faculty at California State University at San Bernardino in the Department of Psychology.[1][2] Modrek was awarded the Deeper Learning Fellowship with the American Institutes for Research[3] and American Educational Research Association,[4][5] a project funded by the Hewlett Foundation where Dr. Modrek was principal investigator studying learning outcomes.[6][7][8]
Dr. Modrek serves as an Editorial Fellow for American Psychological Association's journal, Developmental Psychology[9] and currently serves as an Editorial Board member for journals Learning & Instruction[10] and Learning and Individual Differences.[11]
- ^ "Anahid Modrek | CSUSB".
- ^ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anahid-Modrek
- ^ "Study of Deeper Learning: Opportunities and Outcomes". American Institutes for Research. January 31, 2025.
- ^ https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2025-06/Deeper-Learning-Meet-Cohort-1-6-AERA-Fellows-508-June-2025.pdf
- ^ "AERA Announces Fourth Cohort of Deeper Learning Fellows".
- ^ Modrek, Anahid S.; Lombrozo, Tania (June 19, 2024). "Allow Me to Explain: Benefits of Explaining Extend to Distal Academic Performance". Cognitive Science. 48 (9): e13496. doi:10.1111/cogs.13496. PMID 39285665 – via Wiley Online Library.
- ^ Modrek, Anahid S.; and Drew, Sally Valentino (2025). "Integrating Imagination with Evidence When Writing". Creativity Research Journal. 0: 1–20. doi:10.1080/10400419.2025.2502762 – via Taylor and Francis+NEJM.
- ^ "ORCID".
- ^ https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/dev
- ^ "Editorial board - Learning and Instruction | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier". www.sciencedirect.com.
- ^ "Editorial board - Learning and Individual Differences | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier". www.sciencedirect.com.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.