 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,612 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 18 January 2024 by Mach61 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 November 2023 by SunDawn (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by SunDawn 9 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 14 January 2023 by TheChunky (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by TheChunky 18 months ago. | |
Comment: For notability purposes the insurance trade paper sources run afoul of WP:AUD. Mach61 (talk) 14:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Most of the references are about routine coverage of the corporation, no in-depth coverage of the company is shown. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
| Company type | Private Limited Company |
|---|---|
| Industry | Financial Technology |
| Founded | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Singapore |
Key people | Rob Schimek, CEO |
Number of employees | 1500[1] |
| Website | bolttech |
bolttech is a Singapore-headquartered financial technology company, active in more than 35 markets across Asia, Europe, North America and Africa.[2] It operates a technology-enabled insurance exchange,[3] with $50+ billion in quoted premiums annually.[4]
- ^ "Insurtech Unicorn Bolttech Raises $196 Million in Latest Funding Round". The Wall Street Journal. May 17, 2023.
- ^ Sebastian, Dave (May 17, 2023). "Insurtech Unicorn Bolttech Raises $196 Million in Latest Funding Round". The Wall Street Journal.
- ^ Md Nur, Nurdianah (September 29, 2021). "Making insurance more accessible". The Edge Singapore.
- ^ PricewaterhouseCoopers. "Bolttech CEO on finding balance in a high-growth stage". PwC.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.