| Submission declined on 19 May 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 28 January 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 30 December 2023 by Bilorv (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bilorv 4 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 8 November 2023 by Sionk (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Sionk 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 January 2023 by Bilorv (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Bilorv 16 months ago. | |
Comment: Provided the multiple AfDs, it will most likely be challenged. ToadetteEdit! 10:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Coverage in the marginal/reliable sources is passing and other sources are primary. A source needs to be all of the following to count towards notability: reliable, secondary, in-depth. We then need multiple sources that count towards notability. — Bilorv (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The Cleveland Scene article appears to be substantially about Maupin, but I can't see anything else similar. Sionk (talk) 22:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Caleb Maupin | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | 1988 |
| Education | Baldwin Wallace College |
| Occupation | Political commentator |
| Political party | Center for Political Innovation, Workers World Party (former) |
| Spouse | Meches Rosales-Maupin |
Caleb Maupin (born 1988) is a political activist and commentator known for his support of a social conservative communist ideology, sometimes called "patriotic socialism". Maupin previously worked for the Workers World Party, then reported for Russia Today, and then created his own Center for Political Innovation (CPIUSA).
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search