| Submission declined on 6 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 8 January 2022 by Spicy (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Spicy 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 December 2021 by Mcmatter (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Mcmatter 2 years ago. | |
Comment: There is only one source (The Crimson) that really covers him or his work in depth, and the tone is inappropriate in places - " is a huge anti-Faucist"; "Sadly, medical misinformation such as Ortleb's, along with Micovits', particularly the anti-Faucist, books are read"... it is essential to write in a neutral tone when writing about living persons, regardless of their views; see WP:BLP. Do not cite Reddit or Goodreads. You might find this guideline on writing about fringe topics helpful. Spicy (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 | An editor has marked this as a promising draft and requests that, should it go unedited for six months, G13 deletion be postponed, either by making a dummy/minor edit to the page, or by improving and submitting it for review. Last edited by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] | contribs) 0 seconds ago. (Update) |  |
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] | contribs) 0 seconds ago. (Update)
Save your work by pressing the "Publish page" button below, and a button will appear here allowing you to submit your draft for review. |
Charles Ortleb is an American author, self-publisher, AIDS denialism author and HIV conspiracy theorist,[1] Onetime Editor-in-Chief of That New Magazine, Inc (TNM) publisher of Christopher Street (magazine), The New York Native, CityWeek, Night & Day Entertainment Guide, Opera Monthly and TheaterWeek.
- ^ "Skepticism Of Science In A Pandemic Isn't New. It Helped Fuel The AIDS Crisis". www.knpr.org. Retrieved 2021-05-23.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search