 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,207 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 8 May 2024 by Xoak (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 20 February 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 January 2024 by TheBritinator (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by TheBritinator 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 25 January 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 December 2023 by Qcne (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 6 months ago. | |
Comment: It is still written inappropriately. You need to write in a dry, factual, neutral way. Pretend you are writing an autopsy. I am not rejecting despite three reviews with little improvement, as I believe the film passes our WP:NFILM criteria. But PLEASE read WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK. Qcne (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The first Section is still written completely inappropriately. Qcne (talk) 13:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
| Earth Protectors | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Anne de Carbuccia |
| Written by | Anne de Carbuccia, Luigi Montebello |
| Produced by | Executive producer Max Brun, Associate Executive producer Stefano Curti |
| Cinematography | Luigi Montebello |
| Edited by | Luigi Montebello |
| Music by | Filippo Manni, Massimo Perin |
| Distributed by | Minerva Pictures Internationals |
Release date | 2023 |
Running time | 96 minutes |
| Countries | Italy and USA |
| Languages | English, Italian, French, Spanish, Japanese |
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search