 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,178 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 7 December 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 29 May 2024 by Liance (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Liance 11 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 February 2024 by Chetsford (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Chetsford 14 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 18 February 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 14 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 January 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by BuySomeApples 15 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 January 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 16 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 December 2023 by Qcne (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Qcne 16 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 August 2023 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by HitroMilanese 21 months ago. | |
Comment: Dexerto, Sportskeeda, Metro, Forbes contributor sites are not considered reliable sources. Does not have enough significant coverage in secondary reliable sources to pass WP:NBIO at the moment. ~Liancetalk 22:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Might be notable, but can you remove references to social media, streaming platforms, YT etc and only use the most reliable sources? BuySomeApples (talk) 23:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please see WP:RS. References from independent and reliable sources are essential to establish notability per WP:GNG. Currently, most if not all presented sources are unreliable. Hitro talk 08:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
| ExtraEmily | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Personal information | |
| Born | Emily Xuechun Zhang.[1] January 16, 1998 [1] |
| Nationality |
|
| Education | Columbia University |
| Occupations | |
| Organization | One True King (2023-present) |
| Twitch information | |
| Channel | |
| Years active | 2020–present |
| Genres |
|
| Games | |
| Followers | 470 thousand |
| Associated acts | Mizkif · Emiru · Asmongold · Sodapoppin · Nmplol |
YouTube information | |
| Channel | |
| Years active | 2019–present |
| Genres |
|
| Subscribers | 151 thousand[2] |
| Views | 88.52 million[2] |
Last updated: May 7, 2025 | |
Emily Xuechun Zhang (born January 16, 1998), better known as ExtraEmily, is an American Twitch streamer and YouTuber. She is a member of One True King. Her content primarily focuses on IRL streaming[3].
ExtraEmily has gained notoriety through her unconventional IRL streaming and peoples reactions to it[4][5], her one of a kind content lead to her becoming the most nominated streamer at The Streamer Awards and to winning the "League Of Their Own" award[6]. Additionally, ExtraEmily was the first streamer to have an animated emote of herself "TwitchConHYPE" available on all of Twitch platform[7].
- ^ a b Mukherjee, Shreyan (March 10, 2023). "How old is ExtraEmily? Tracing the OTK member's age, streaming career, and more". sportskeeda.com. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
- ^ a b "About ExtraEmily". YouTube.
- ^ Maddock, Bryson (April 24, 2023). "Twitch Partner ExtraEmily shares her life as an IRL Streamer". esports.gg. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
policewas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
crackwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
winnerswas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Twitch [@Twitch] (Oct 20, 2023). "Congrats @extraemilyy, your emote is now official out TwitchCon emote and will be a Twitch global emote for an entire year!" (Tweet). Las Vegas. Retrieved Apr 2, 2024 – via Twitter.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.