| Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by Hey man im josh (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 8 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 18 days ago. | |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Henrik von Scheel (born October 19, 1969) is a danish business strategist and futurist known to have ignited the digital and Fourth Industrial Revolution themes of today.[1][2] [3][4][5][6][7][8]. He is a Professor, who dedicated two decades to the research and study of strategy in the scientific disciplines of Patternicity, Statistical, and Probabilistic Analysis.[9]
- ^ "CNBC: Most influential futurist of our century". CNBC.
- ^ "Digital Business magazine: Industry 4.0 originator & Leading authority on Strategy". Digital Biz Magazine. 19 May 2019.
- ^ "The Technology Record: How Industry 4.0 is accelerating business".
- ^ "Gulf News: Arabian Peninsula on the verge of innovation explosion: Von Scheel". 10 April 2018.
- ^ "Gulf News: Dubai has the potential to lead Industry 4.0". 30 September 2019.
- ^ "Who is who: Industry 4.0 Originator". 21 March 2023.
- ^ Dharmarajan, Sridhar. "Times: Father of the Industry 4.0 Originator". The Times of India.
- ^ "Navigating the Future with the most Influential futurist". Voices of the Future.
- ^ "Professor at Arthur Lok Jack Global School of Business".
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search