 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,560 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by Garsh2 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 29 days ago. | |
Comment: While there was improvement since the last rejection, large sections of the article are still unsourced. Certain sections of the article lack encyclopedic tone (see WP:EPSTYLE), which may be an issue at a later date if not addressed. Notability is likely established for this topic given the coverage around this film, but it may be helpful to include more sources that show such coverage. The entire "Further Reading" section does not appear suitable for an encyclopedia because it violates WP:NPOV and is simply a long list of external links. Please consider these changes and resubmit. My talk page is available for help. Garsh (talk) 03:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
| HIPPOCRITES: A Broken Oath in Reproductive Health | |
|---|---|
 Promotional release poster | |
| Directed by | |
| Written by |
|
| Produced by |
|
| Starring |
|
| Cinematography |
|
| Edited by |
|
| Music by | David Bessler |
Production company | |
Release date | June 24, 2024 |
Running time | 6 minutes |
| Country | U.S.A. |
| Language | English |
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search