 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,391 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 16 January 2024 by UtherSRG (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 25 October 2023 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 June 2023 by Scope creep (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Scope creep 11 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 16 November 2022 by UtherSRG (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by UtherSRG 19 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 6 March 2021 by TJMSmith (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by TJMSmith 3 years ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 27 September 2020 by DGG (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DGG 3 years ago. | |
Comment: Adding a YouTube link did not improve the article - and it should not be added as a reference, only as an external link. See WP:RSPYT. Please also read WP:BACKWARDS to get a better idea on how to successfully write an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: for any bibliographic information, all information must be cited per WP:BLP. Please review the early life section and make adjustments as necessary microbiologyMarcus (petri dish) 14:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Please read the policy links in the comment below. Answer the question "What is notable about this professor that satisfies these policies?" Then provide edits and citations that support your answer. UtherSRG (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This physician and academic does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. If that changes, feel free to resubmit. TJMSmith (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Dr. Jaime Claudio Villamil is a Puerto Rican medical doctor, television reporter, psychologist, professor, and writer who has published a book on the uses of medical cannabis, in addition to numerous newspaper columns in El Nuevo Día. He has a family practice in Santurce, San Juan, Puerto Rico.[1] Claudio Villamil is a professor AD-Honorem at Universidad de Puerto Rico.[2] He studied at the Georgia Institute of Technology and graduated cum laude at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is known internationally for his advocacy for the use of medical cannabis and for his work in Puerto Rico during the COVID-19 pandemic.[3]
- ^ https://health.usnews.com/doctors/jaime-claudio-villamil-488470
- ^ "Devastadora conexión entre el estrés y la salud". Primera Hora. 26 August 2017.
- ^ Hester, Mieko (October 16, 2021). "Global Healthcare Conversations with Mieko Perez ft. Dr. Jaime Claudio". Homegrown.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search