| Submission declined on 6 May 2025 by MarcGarver (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 5 May 2025 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by HitroMilanese 15 days ago. | |
Comment: I've made this easier for you by removing the various "references" you added that are not suitable and I have replaced them with tags for a citation needed. For example, LinkedIn, SoundCloud, blogs, YouTube, a CV upload site, are all self published and are not usable as a reference. Anyone can write anything on their LinkedIn profile so it isn't acceptable as a source. MarcGarver (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Additional references from independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability. Currently, the draft is sourced to mostly unreliable sources such as Soundcloud, YouTube, LinkedIn etc. Hitro talk 10:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Lindie Botes | |
|---|---|
| Born | Pretoria, South Africa |
| Occupation(s) | Product Designer, Language Coach, Educator |
| Known for | Language learning content, Co-founder of Wikitongues |
| Website | https://lindiebotes.com |
Lindie Botes is a South African polyglot, product designer, language coach, and educator. She is known for her language learning content on YouTube, where she documents her methods for learning and maintaining multiple languages. Botes is a co-founder of Wikitongues, a non-profit organization that aims to document and promote languages worldwide. She speaks more than 12 languages at various levels of proficiency.[1]
- ^ "How Lindie Botes Learned 12+ Languages – StoryLearning". 19 December 2022.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search