 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,926 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 25 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 March 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Paul W 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 February 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 4 months ago. | |
Comment: IMDB is not a reliable source, because it is user edited. Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Article featured numerous external links embedded in the body of the article. If these were intended as references, they should be created as footnotes/inline citations. Article needs references to significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. Paul W (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: zero independent sources? Theroadislong (talk) 09:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Nico Norena (born June 17, 1993) is an American recipe developer, content creator, and entrepreneur who lives in Miami, Florida. He is the founder and CEO of The Succulent Bite Inc. (2016–present).[1] Norena gained social media traction on Instagram through developing dessert recipes and documenting travel experiences.[2] He launched a blog, The Succulent Bite, where he publishes recipes. Norena's career took off in the content creation space while posting daily food videos.[3]
He launched his first cookbook on August 23, 2022 named, “The Succulent Bite: 60+ Easy Recipes for Over-the-Top Desserts."[4] Norena was named on the Forbes 30 under 30 list in the Food & Drink category, which estimates his profit in brand deals to be over $1 million as of 2022.[5]
- ^ "The Succulent Bite Inc". Buzzfile. 2016.
- ^ Gonzalez, Cristina (2021-02-25). "FIU Alumnus' Food Blog, "Succulent Bite" Takes Off". PantherNOW. Retrieved 2024-03-18.
- ^ "Succulent Success: South Florida influencer becomes worldwide internet sensation". WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale. 2021-09-18. Retrieved 2024-03-18.
- ^ Noble, Barnes &. "The Succulent Bite: 60+ Easy Recipes for Over-the-Top Desserts|Paperback". Barnes & Noble. Retrieved 2024-03-04.
- ^ "Nicolas Norena". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-03-18.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search