![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,192 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 25 March 2025 by AgerJoy (talk). Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 January 2025 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Chaotic Enby 4 months ago.
| ![]() |
The numerosity of an infinite set, as introduced by the Italian mathematician Vieri Benci and some of his collaborators, is a concept that develops Cantor’s notion of cardinality. While Cantor’s classical cardinality classifies sets based on the existence of a one-to-one correspondence with other sets (defining, for example, for countable sets, and so on for larger infinities), the idea of numerosity aims to provide an alternative viewpoint, linking to the common Euclidean notion that "the whole is greater than the part". All of this naturally leads to the hypernatural numbers.[1]
In short, Benci and his collaborators propose associating with an infinite set a numerical value that more directly reflects its “number of elements”, without resorting solely to one-to-one correspondences[2][3][4][5][6][7]. This approach uses tools from logic and analysis, seeking to give an operational meaning to the notion of “counting” even when dealing with infinite sets. Numerosity thus proves useful for the study of certain problems in discrete mathematics and is the subject of research within alternative (or complementary) theories to traditional Cantorian cardinality.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search