Submission declined on 31 July 2024 by Bluethricecreamman (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 December 2023 by Sohom Datta (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Sohom Datta 8 months ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 7 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 9 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 28 October 2022 by GRuban (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by GRuban 21 months ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 25 June 2022 by Stuartyeates (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Stuartyeates 2 years ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 27 May 2022 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 2 years ago.
| ![]() |
Original author(s) | Colin Curtain |
---|---|
Stable release | 3.3
/ 18 May 2023 |
Written in | Python |
Operating system | Windows, macOS, Linux |
License | MIT License |
Website | https://github.com/ccbogel/QualCoder |
QualCoder is a free open-source, qualitative data analysis software created by Colin Curtain in January 2019.[1] It allows for qualitative data analysis of text, images, audio, and video. QualCoder is based on Python programming language and is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux. It is inspired by and draws from the RQDA R package.[2][3]
QualCoder has been discussed in the American Journal of Qualitative Research,[4] and has been recognized in university libraries.
:6
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.