 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,877 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 15 September 2023 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 13 July 2023 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Tomorrow X Together. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you. Declined by Robert McClenon 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 March 2023 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Robert McClenon 16 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 January 2023 by Robertsky (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Robertsky 17 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 September 2022 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by S0091 22 months ago. | |
Comment: still no visible improvement? Theroadislong (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting. You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Tomorrow X Together. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Tomorrow X Together.Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.There has not been discussion on the talk page of the parent article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Tomorrow X Together. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk: Tomorrow X Together.Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.Does he have any individual accomplishments, not as a member of the group, that satisfy musical notability? Robert McClenon (talk) 05:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: WP:NBANDMEMBER – robertsky (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources do not support he his independently notable outside of Tomorrow X Together. S0091 (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] | contribs) 0 seconds ago. (Update)
This draft has been submitted and is currently awaiting review. |
Yeonjun | |
|---|---|
.jpg) Yeonjun at Dior Sauvage campaign event in March 2024 | |
| Born | Choi Yeon-jun September 13, 1999 |
| Other names | Daniel Choi |
| Education | Global Cyber University |
| Occupations |
|
| Years active | 2019–present |
| Musical career | |
| Genres | |
| Instrument(s) | Vocals |
| Labels | |
| Member of | |
| Korean name | |
| Hangul | 최연준 |
| Hanja | |
| Revised Romanization | Choi Yeonjun |
| McCune–Reischauer | Ch'oe Yŏnchun |
| Signature | |
 | |
Choi Yeon-jun (Korean: 최연준; born September 13, 1999),[1] known as Yeonjun (Korean: 연준), is a South Korean singer-songwriter. He is a member of the South Korean boy group Tomorrow X Together.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search