EmDrive

EmDrive
EmDrive experiment, Eagleworks laboratory, 2013
Country of originUnited States
Date2001
StatusDevice concept
Performance
Thrust, sea-levelN (0 ozf)[1]

The EmDrive is a controversial device first proposed in 2001,[2][3][4][5] purported by its inventors to be a reactionless drive. While no mechanism for operation was proposed, this would violate the law of conservation of momentum and other laws of physics.[6][7][8][9][10] The concept has at times been referred to as a resonant cavity thruster.[11][12] The idea is generally considered by physicists to be pseudoscience.

Neither person who claims to have invented it committed to details about it beyond showing prototypes they have built.[13] While the lack of a published design or mechanism makes it hard to say whether a given object is an example of an EmDrive, over the years prototypes based on its public descriptions have been constructed and tested.

In 2016, Harold White's group at NASA observed a small apparent thrust from one such test,[14] however subsequent studies suggested this was a measurement error caused by thermal gradients.[15][16] In 2018 and 2021, Martin Tajmar's group at the Dresden University of Technology replicated and refuted White's results, observing apparent thrusts similar to those measured by his team, and then made them disappear again when measured using point suspension.[1]

No other published experiment measured apparent thrust greater than the experiment's margin of error.[17] Tajmar's group published three papers in 2021 claiming that all published results showing thrust had been false positives, explaining each by outside forces. They concluded, "Our measurements refute all EmDrive claims by at least 3 orders of magnitude."[1]

  1. ^ a b c Delbert, Caroline (31 March 2021). "Scientists Just Killed the EmDrive". popularmechanics.com. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference Powell was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference JBIS 2016a was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference shawyertheory 9.3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Breeze, Nick (29 July 2015). "Roger Shawyer, EmDrive Interview, 2015". Envisionation UK.
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference NASA AIAA 2014 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ "The Impossible Propulsion Drive Is Heading to Space". popularmechanics.com. 2 September 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
  8. ^ Crew, Bec (6 September 2016). "The 'Impossible' EM Drive Is About to Be Tested in Space". sciencealert.com. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
  9. ^ "NASA Team Claims 'Impossible' Space Engine Works—Get the Facts". National Geographic. 21 November 2016. Archived from the original on 22 November 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
  10. ^ Poitras, Colin (7 December 2016). "To Mars in 70 days: Expert discusses NASA's study of paradoxical EM propulsion drive". Phys.org. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
  11. ^ Templeton, Graham (16 September 2016). "Can the 'impossible' space drive survive falsification in orbit? – ExtremeTech". Extremetech. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
  12. ^ Hambling, David (7 August 2014). "10 questions about Nasa's 'impossible' space drive answered". Wired UK. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference egan was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ Cite error: The named reference Nat Geo Peer review was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference tajmar20180514 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ Cite error: The named reference tajmar20210401 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ "'Impossible' EmDrive Space Thruster May Really Be Impossible". Space.com. Retrieved 3 September 2018.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search