Eumetazoa (from Ancient Greekεὖ (eû)'well'μετά (metá)'after' and ζῷον (zôion)'animal'), also known as diploblasts, Epitheliozoa or Histozoa, are a proposed basalanimalclade as a sister group of Porifera (sponges).[7][8][9][10][11] The basal eumetazoan clades are the Ctenophora and the ParaHoxozoa. Placozoa is now also seen as a eumetazoan in the ParaHoxozoa. The competing hypothesis is the Myriazoa clade.[12] The Subkingdom Parazoa and Agnotozoa are the other taxa, and agnotozoa may be fake or even nonexistent at studies. Parazoa or Agnotozoa are a main sister group to eumetazoans, forming clade Blastozoa/Diploblastozoa. Alternatively,
Parazoa is the sister group to Agnotozoa, forming Monoblastozoa/Simplecita.
Several other extinct or obscure life forms, such as Iotuba and Thectardis, appear to have emerged in the group.[13] Characteristics of eumetazoans include true tissues organized into germ layers, the presence of neurons and muscles, and an embryo that goes through a gastrula stage.
Some phylogenists once speculated the sponges and eumetazoans evolved separately from different single-celled organisms, which would have meant that the animal kingdom does not form a clade (a complete grouping of all organisms descended from a common ancestor). However, genetic studies and some morphological characteristics, like the common presence of choanocytes, now unanimously support a common origin.[14]
Traditionally, eumetazoans are a major group of animals in the Five Kingdoms classification of Lynn Margulis and K. V. Schwartz, comprising the Radiata and Bilateria – all animals except the sponges.[15] When treated as a formal taxon Eumetazoa is typically ranked as a subkingdom. The name Metazoa has also been used to refer to this group, but more often refers to the Animalia as a whole. Many classification schemes do not include the subkingdom Eumetazoa.
^{{cite
Mikhail A. Fedonkin initially classified Trilobozoa as a class within the phylum Coelenterata, which at that time included both cnidarians and ctenophores-groups that are part of the Eumetazoa subkingdom. Following the division of Coelenterata into separate phyla (Cnidaria and Ctenophora), Trilobozoa was elevated to its own phylum.Therefore, while Fedonkin's initial classification placed Trilobozoa within Eumetazoa, the current understanding of their exact phylogenetic position remains uncertain and subject to ongoing debate though, it is generally considered to be within Eumetazoa.}}
^Lankester, Ray (1877). "Notes on the Embryology and classification of the Animal kingdom: comprising a revision of speculations relative to the origin and significance of the germ-layers". Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science (N.S.), No. 68: 399–454.
^Beklemishev, V. L. The basis of the comparative anatomy of the invertebrates [Основы сравнительной анатомии беспозвоночных]. 1st ed., 1944; 2nd ed., 1950; 3rd ed. (2 vols.), 1964. English translation, 1969, [1]. Akademia Nauk, Moscow, Leningrad.
^Ulrich, W. (1950). "Begriff und Einteilung der Protozoen". In Grüneberg, H. (ed.). Moderne Biologie. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Nachtsheim (in German). Berlin: Peters. pp. 241–250.