Euromyth

A euromyth is a exaggerated or invented story about the European Union (EU) and the activities of its institutions, such as purportedly nonsensical EU legislation.^[1]

Conversely, the same term has been applied by Eurosceptics to purportedly misleading or exaggerated claims by the European Commission, and some assert that the term (in the former sense) is falsely applied to true stories.^[2]^[3]

Debate as to whether a particular claim is true sometimes continues long after the original story appeared.^[4] On occasions, Euromyths may arise when the actions of a different European organisation, such as the Council of Europe, are erroneously attributed to the EU.^[5]

In 2000, the British government announced a policy of publicly rebutting such myths and accused journalists of failing in their mission to inform.^[6]^{[needs update]} Accusations of distorted or untruthful reporting are most commonly directed at conservative and Eurosceptic sections of the British media.^[7] Stories can present the European civil service^[8] as drafting rules that "defy common sense". Examples cited as Euromyths include stories about rules banning mince pies, prawn cocktail crisps, curved bananas and mushy peas.^[1] Others include a story that English fish and chips shops would be forced to use Latin names for their fish (The Sun, 5 September 2001),^[8] quoted in^[9] that double-decker buses would be banned (The Times, 9 April 1998),^[10] that barmaids would have to cover up their cleavage.^[11]

In some cases, Euromyth stories have been traced to deliberate attempts by lobbyists to influence actions by the European bureaucracy, such as the level of customs duties for particular products.^[12]^[13] EU officials have also claimed that many such stories result from unclear or misunderstood information on complicated policies,^[14] and are claimed to have seized on minor errors in stories as evidence that they are entirely fictional.^[15]

^ ^a ^b Stanyer, James (2007). Modern Political Communication: Mediated Politics in Uncertain Times (revised ed.). Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-2797-7. The right-wing press regularly ridicules the EU for constructing silly and petty rules. One of the most popular forms of reporting EU matters is the so-called Euro-myth. These are exaggerated stories or even inventions about the activities of EU bodies, or EU directives which defy "common sense", such as the banning of mince pies, curved bananas, busty barmaids, soya milk, mushy peas, vitamin supplements – to name a few of the numerous examples ... "Guide to the best euromyths". BBC News. BBC. 23 March 2007. Archived from the original on 21 April 2010. Retrieved 14 May 2016. The British public loves a euro-furore - a story about changes to our traditional way of doing things, usually dreamt up by "barmy Brussels bureaucrats" or "meddling eurocrats".
^ Leach, Rodney (2000). Europe: A Concise Encyclopedia of the European Union from Aachen to Zollverein (3rd ed.). Profile Books. ISBN 1861972806. Archived from the original on 1 June 2009.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
^ Crowley, Patrick M. (25 July 2002). Before and Beyond EMU: Historical Lessons and Future Prospects. Routledge. ISBN 9781134458059.
^ Daniel Hannan (12 November 2008). "Bent bananas not a Euromyth after all". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 10 June 2010. Retrieved 27 September 2009. Hang on: I thought it was all meant to be a scare story. Whenever Euro-enthusiasts found themselves losing an argument, they would say, "You're making all this up: it's a tabloid Euro-myth, like bent bananas". [...] Yet it now turns out that, by the EU's own admission, there were rules specifying the maximum permitted curvature of bananas.
^ BBC (23 March 2007). "Guide to the best euromyths". BBC News Channel. Retrieved 9 April 2009. In 2002 the press reported a threat to certain breeds of the Queen's favourite dog from "a controversial EU convention". The story turned on one key mistake. A European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals does exist, and it does condemn the breeding of some varieties of dogs as pets. However, it is a product of the Council of Europe, Europe's main human rights 'watchdog', not of the European Union, or 'Brussels bureaucrats'..
^ "Cook warns against EU scare stories". London: Guardian News and Media Limited. 13 November 2000. Retrieved 11 April 2009. Euromyths provide great fun for journalists. The media has a mission to entertain, and some of them rise magnificently to that goal, Mr Cook said. "But they are failing in their other mission – to inform. From now on, the Government will be rebutting all such stories vigorously and promptly. You will be hearing the catchphrase 'facts, not myths' until that is the way the EU is reported.
^ Gruber, Barbara (24 August 2007). "Euromyths: Brussels bunkum or tabloid trash?". Network Europe. Archived from the original (Audio) on 28 June 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2009.
^ ^a ^b The Sun, 5 September 2001, quoted in Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1. Chippies [i.e. fish and chip shops] could be forced to sell fish by their ancient Latin names—thanks to the craziest European ruling so far. If barmy Brussels bureaucrats get their way, baffled Brits will have to ask for hippoglossus hippoglossus instead of plain halibut. ... Takeaway, restaurants, fishmongers and supermarkets are all set to be BANNED from using names that have been around for centuries
^ Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1.
^ quoted in Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1.
^ BBC (23 March 2007). "Guide to the best Euromyths". BBC News Channel. Retrieved 9 April 2009. There was great alarm in 2005 when it was reported that 'po-faced pen-pushers' from the EU had ordered a cover-up of barmaids' cleavages.
^ Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1. In January 2002 a spate of stories appeared in the UK press that briefly cast light on how Euromyths are manufactured and for what sort of purrpose... Close inspection... revealed the source of the story... to be a well-known sauce manufacturer that had retained a commercial lobby group with a remit to find a way round EU rules....
^ Osborn, Andrew (11 January 2002). "Why journalists protect their sauces". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 April 2009. It all began, I am reliably informed, in the boardroom of a well known sauce manufacturer which must remain nameless. [...] Such firms do not understandably like to be seen manipulating or greasing the wheels of power for their own ends, so the company in question retained a lobbying firm which must also remain nameless.
^ "Euromyths: Fact and fiction". CNN. 8 June 2004. Retrieved 27 April 2009.
^ Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1. However, a senior EU spokesman put his own particular spin on the issue by pointing out one minor journalistic error in The Times' coverage as evidence that UK news reports were entirely fabricated.

[Stanyer-1] Stanyer, James (2007). Modern Political Communication: Mediated Politics in Uncertain Times (revised ed.). Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-2797-7. The right-wing press regularly ridicules the EU for constructing silly and petty rules. One of the most popular forms of reporting EU matters is the so-called Euro-myth. These are exaggerated stories or even inventions about the activities of EU bodies, or EU directives which defy "common sense", such as the banning of mince pies, curved bananas, busty barmaids, soya milk, mushy peas, vitamin supplements – to name a few of the numerous examples ... "Guide to the best euromyths". BBC News. BBC. 23 March 2007. Archived from the original on 21 April 2010. Retrieved 14 May 2016. The British public loves a euro-furore - a story about changes to our traditional way of doing things, usually dreamt up by "barmy Brussels bureaucrats" or "meddling eurocrats".

[Euro-sceptic_Web_Ring-2] Leach, Rodney (2000). Europe: A Concise Encyclopedia of the European Union from Aachen to Zollverein (3rd ed.). Profile Books. ISBN 1861972806. Archived from the original on 1 June 2009.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)

[3] Crowley, Patrick M. (25 July 2002). Before and Beyond EMU: Historical Lessons and Future Prospects. Routledge. ISBN 9781134458059.

[4] Daniel Hannan (12 November 2008). "Bent bananas not a Euromyth after all". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 10 June 2010. Retrieved 27 September 2009. Hang on: I thought it was all meant to be a scare story. Whenever Euro-enthusiasts found themselves losing an argument, they would say, "You're making all this up: it's a tabloid Euro-myth, like bent bananas". [...] Yet it now turns out that, by the EU's own admission, there were rules specifying the maximum permitted curvature of bananas.

[bbcmyths_corgis-5] BBC (23 March 2007). "Guide to the best euromyths". BBC News Channel. Retrieved 9 April 2009. In 2002 the press reported a threat to certain breeds of the Queen's favourite dog from "a controversial EU convention". The story turned on one key mistake. A European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals does exist, and it does condemn the breeding of some varieties of dogs as pets. However, it is a product of the Council of Europe, Europe's main human rights 'watchdog', not of the European Union, or 'Brussels bureaucrats'..

[Cook-6] "Cook warns against EU scare stories". London: Guardian News and Media Limited. 13 November 2000. Retrieved 11 April 2009. Euromyths provide great fun for journalists. The media has a mission to entertain, and some of them rise magnificently to that goal, Mr Cook said. "But they are failing in their other mission – to inform. From now on, the Government will be rebutting all such stories vigorously and promptly. You will be hearing the catchphrase 'facts, not myths' until that is the way the EU is reported.

[NetworkEurope2007-08-24-7] Gruber, Barbara (24 August 2007). "Euromyths: Brussels bunkum or tabloid trash?". Network Europe. Archived from the original (Audio) on 28 June 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2009.

[Cross_hippoglossus-8] The Sun, 5 September 2001, quoted in Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1. Chippies [i.e. fish and chip shops] could be forced to sell fish by their ancient Latin names—thanks to the craziest European ruling so far. If barmy Brussels bureaucrats get their way, baffled Brits will have to ask for hippoglossus hippoglossus instead of plain halibut. ... Takeaway, restaurants, fishmongers and supermarkets are all set to be BANNED from using names that have been around for centuries

[9] Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1.

[Cross_other-10] quoted in Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1.

[bbcmyths_barmaids-11] BBC (23 March 2007). "Guide to the best Euromyths". BBC News Channel. Retrieved 9 April 2009. There was great alarm in 2005 when it was reported that 'po-faced pen-pushers' from the EU had ordered a cover-up of barmaids' cleavages.

[Hippoglossus-p56-12] Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1. In January 2002 a spate of stories appeared in the UK press that briefly cast light on how Euromyths are manufactured and for what sort of purrpose... Close inspection... revealed the source of the story... to be a well-known sauce manufacturer that had retained a commercial lobby group with a remit to find a way round EU rules....

[13] Osborn, Andrew (11 January 2002). "Why journalists protect their sauces". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 April 2009. It all began, I am reliably informed, in the boardroom of a well known sauce manufacturer which must remain nameless. [...] Such firms do not understandably like to be seen manipulating or greasing the wheels of power for their own ends, so the company in question retained a lobbying firm which must also remain nameless.

[CNN20040608-14] "Euromyths: Fact and fiction". CNN. 8 June 2004. Retrieved 27 April 2009.

[15] Cross, Simon (2008). "Hippoglossus hippoglossus and chips: Twice please love? Adventures in the underbelly of Euromyths". In Richard Keeble (ed.). Communication Ethics Now. Troubador Publishing Ltd. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-906221-04-1. However, a senior EU spokesman put his own particular spin on the issue by pointing out one minor journalistic error in The Times' coverage as evidence that UK news reports were entirely fabricated.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]