Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper

Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper
Argued November 30, 2011
Decided March 28, 2012
Full case nameFederal Aviation Administration, Social Security Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Petitioners v. Stanmore Cawthon Cooper
Docket no.10-1024
Citations566 U.S. 284 (more)
132 S. Ct. 1441; 182 L. Ed. 2d 497; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2539; 80 U.S.L.W. 4289; 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 222
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorSummary judgment for respondent, 816 F. Supp. 2d 778 (N.D. Cal. 2008); reversed and remanded, 596 F.3d 538 (9th Cir. 2010); rehearing denied, 622 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2010); cert. granted, 564 U.S. 1018 (2011).
Holding
The authorization of suits against the government for “actual damages” in the Privacy Act of 1974 is not sufficiently clear to constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity from suits for mental and emotional distress.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityAlito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
DissentSotomayor, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Privacy Act of 1974

Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 284 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "actual damages" under the Privacy Act of 1974 is not clear enough to allow damages for suits for mental and emotional distress.[1] The reasoning behind this is that the United States Congress, when authorizing suit against the government, must be clear in waiving the government's sovereign immunity.

  1. ^ Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 284 (2012).

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search