Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued November 30, 2004 Decided March 29, 2005 | |
Full case name | Roderick Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education |
Docket no. | 02-1672 |
Citations | 544 U.S. 167 (more) 125 S. Ct. 1497; 161 L. Ed. 2d 361 |
Case history | |
Prior | Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 309 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir. 2002); cert. granted, 542 U.S. 903 (2004). |
Subsequent | Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 416 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2005) |
Holding | |
Retaliation against a person because that person has complained of sex discrimination is a form of intentional sex discrimination encompassed by Title IX's private right of action | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Dissent | Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy |
Laws applied | |
Title IX, . |
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167 (2005), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that retaliation against a person because that person has complained of sex discrimination is a form of intentional sex discrimination encompassed by Title IX.[1]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search