During the Killian documents controversy in 2004, the authenticity of the documents themselves was disputed by a variety of individuals and groups. Proof of authenticity is not possible without original documents, and since CBS used only faxed and photocopied duplicates, authentication to professional standards would be impossible regardless of the provenance of the originals. However, proving documents inauthentic does not depend on the availability of originals, and the validity of these photocopied documents has been challenged on a number of grounds,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] ranging from anachronisms in their typography to issues pertaining to their content.
- ^ "The Bush National Guard Story Lives!". motherjones.com.
- ^ "Are the Bush Documents Fakes?". xavier.edu.
- ^ McArdle, Megan (24 July 2014). "Ex-'60 Minutes' Producer Is No Hollywood Hero". Bloomberg.com – via www.bloomberg.com.
- ^ "Killian Finale?". washingtonmonthly.com. 15 September 2004.
- ^ "Truth or Consequences". texasmonthly.com. 21 January 2013.
- ^ Levin, Josh (10 September 2004). "Rather Suspicious" – via Slate.
- ^ "CBS News admits Bush documents can't be verified". NBC News. 21 September 2004.
- ^ Fleishman, Glenn (13 September 2017). "Meet the Font Detectives Who Ferret Out Fakery". Wired.com.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search