Missouri v. Frye

Missouri v. Frye
Argued October 31, 2011
Decided March 21, 2012
Full case nameMissouri v. Galin E. Frye
Docket no.10-444
Citations566 U.S. 134 (more)
132 S. Ct. 1399, 182 L. Ed. 2d 379 (2012).
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
"Defense counsel has the duty to communicate formal offers from the prosecution to accept a plea on terms and conditions that may be favorable to the accused."[1]
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
DissentScalia, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV

Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that attorneys of criminal defendants have the duty to communicate plea bargains offered to the accused.[1]

  1. ^ a b Missouri v. Frye, 566 S. Ct. 134, 145 (U.S. 2012).
    Preview warning: Page using Template:Cite court with unknown parameter "via"

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search