Part of the Politics series |
Electoral systems |
---|
Politics portal |
The monotonicity criterion, also called positive response[1] or positive vote weight,[2] is a principle of social choice theory that says that increasing a candidate's ranking or rating should not cause them to lose.[3] Positive response rules out cases where a candidate loses an election as a result of receiving too much support from voters (i.e. being "too popular to win").
Systems that violate positive response (such as instant-runoff) can create situations where a ballot has the opposite effect of what the voter intended. This runs counter to the intuition that increasing an option's popularity in a democratic election should only improve the chances of that option winning. As a result, German courts have previously struck down nonmonotonic systems for violating the right to equal and direct suffrage.[4][5]
Most voting systems (including Borda and all common tournament solutions) satisfy monotonicity,[3] as do all commonly-used rated voting methods (including approval and score).[note 1]
However, the criterion is violated by instant-runoff voting,[6] the single transferable vote, and Hamilton's apportionment method.[2]
The participation criterion is a closely-related, but different, concept. While positive responsiveness deals with a voter changing their opinion (or vote), participation deals with situations where a voter choosing to cast a ballot can have a reversed effect on the election.
Cite error: There are <ref group=note>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}}
template (see the help page).
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search