Natalism

Natalism (also called pronatalism or the pro-birth position) is an ideology that promotes the reproduction of human life as an important objective of being human and advocates high birthrate.[1] According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the term, as it relates to the belief itself, dates from 1971 and comes from French: nataliste, formed from French: natalité, birthrate.[2]

Natalism promotes child-bearing and parenthood as desirable for social reasons and to ensure the continuance of humanity. Some philosophers have noted that if humans fail to have children, humans would become extinct.[3][4] However, many reproductive rights advocates and environmentalists see it as a driver of reproductive injustice, population growth, and ecological overshoot.[5][6][7][8][9][10] Natalism in public policy typically seeks to create financial and social incentives for populations to reproduce, such as providing tax incentives that reward having and supporting children.[6] Those who adhere to more strict natalism may seek to limit access to abortion and contraception, as well.[11] The opposite of natalism is antinatalism; however most feminists and reproductive rights advocates challenge natalism in order to elevate procreative freedom, and do not align with antinatalism.[12][6]

  1. ^ Compare: McKeown, John (2014). "1: Natalism: A Popular Use of the Bible". God's Babies: Natalism and Bible Interpretation in Modern America. Cambridge: Open Books. p. 2. ISBN 9781783740529. Retrieved 2018-12-08. Natalism is an ideology that advocates a high birth rate within a community.[...] The central message is that parents should have additional children.
  2. ^ "natalism". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary.
  3. ^ Anthony, Andrew (2023-07-22). "'What if everybody decided not to have children?' The philosopher questioning humanity's future". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 2024-02-06.
  4. ^ Arand, Dustin (2022-11-29). "The Very Nice People Who Want Humanity to Go Extinct". Politically Speaking. Retrieved 2024-02-06.
  5. ^ Merz, Joseph J; Barnard, Phoebe; Rees, William E; Smith, Dane; Maroni, Mat; Rhodes, Christopher J; Dederer, Julia H; Bajaj, Nandita; Joy, Michael K; Wiedmann, Thomas; Sutherland, Rory (2023-09-20). "World scientists' warning: The behavioural crisis driving ecological overshoot". Science Progress. 106 (3). doi:10.1177/00368504231201372. ISSN 0036-8504. PMC 10515534. PMID 37728669.
  6. ^ a b c Bajaj, Nandita; Stade, Kirsten (2023-02-03). "Challenging Pronatalism Is Key to Advancing Reproductive Rights and a Sustainable Population". The Journal of Population and Sustainability. 7 (1): 39–70. doi:10.3197/JPS.63799953906861. ISSN 2398-5496.
  7. ^ Bajaj, Nandita (2023-02-28). "Coercive Pro-Birth Policies Have Devastating Impacts on People and the Planet". Newsweek. Retrieved 2024-04-18.
  8. ^ Carroll, Laura (2012-05-17). The Baby Matrix: Why Freeing Our Minds From Outmoded Thinking About Parenthood & Reproduction Will Create a Better World. United States: LiveTrue Books. ISBN 978-0615642994.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  9. ^ "Judith Blake on Fertility Control and the Problem of Voluntarism". Population and Development Review. 20 (1): 167–177. 1994. doi:10.2307/2137635. ISSN 0098-7921. JSTOR 2137635.
  10. ^ Dasgupta, Aisha; Dasgupta, Partha (2017). "Socially Embedded Preferences, Environmental Externalities, and Reproductive Rights". Population and Development Review. 43 (3): 405–441. doi:10.1111/padr.12090. ISSN 0098-7921. JSTOR 26622829.
  11. ^ Bajaj, Nandita (2022-07-06). "Abortion Bans Are a Natural Outgrowth of Coercive Pronatalism". Ms. Magazine. Retrieved 2024-04-18.
  12. ^ Hedberg, Trevor (2021-12-13). The Environmental Impact of Overpopulation: The Ethics of Procreation (1st ed.). United States: Routledge. pp. 110–135. ISBN 978-1032236766.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search