Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 29, 2009 Decided June 22, 2009 | |
Full case name | Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Eric Holder, Attorney General |
Docket no. | 08-322 |
Citations | 557 U.S. 193 (more) 129 S. Ct. 2504; 174 L. Ed. 2d 140; 2009 U.S. LEXIS 4539; 77 U.S.L.W. 4539; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 965 |
Holding | |
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 stands, but districts should be better able to "bail out" of it per Section 4(a). | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito |
Concur/dissent | Thomas |
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and in particular its requirement that proposed electoral-law changes in certain states must be approved by the federal government. In a 9–0 decision, the Court concluded that the district was eligible to apply for an exemption (bailout) from this section per Section 4(a), because the definition of "political subdivision" in Section 14(c)(2) included a district of this nature. In an 8–1 opinion, the Court declined to rule on the constitutionality of that provision, citing the principle of constitutional avoidance.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search