Police reform in the United States

A George Floyd protest in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 28, 2020

Police reform in the United States is an ongoing political movement that seeks to reform systems of law enforcement throughout the United States. Many goals of the police reform movement center on police accountability. Specific goals may include: lowering the criminal intent standard, limiting or abolishing qualified immunity for law enforcement officers, sensitivity training, conflict prevention and mediation training, updating legal frameworks, and granting administrative subpoena power to the U.S. Department of Justice for "pattern or practice" investigations into police misconduct and police brutality.[1][2]

As of May 2023, no updated federal police reform legislation has fully passed the United States Congress. The most recent bill, the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021, was introduced by then-California Representative Karen Bass in the 117th Congress in response to the murder of George Floyd in May 2020.[2][3][4] The bill passed the House of Representatives on March 3, 2021, and was received by the Senate six days later on March 9.[2] The bill collapsed in September 2021 after failed bipartisan negotiations in the Senate.[5]

The history of law enforcement in the United States includes many efforts at police reform. Early efforts at police reform often involved external commissions, such as the Wickersham Commission, that spelled out reforms but left to the police to implement them, often with limited success.[6]

A series of U.S. Supreme Court decisions under the Warren Court led to important changes in policing, with respect to civil rights and constitutional law. Mapp v. Ohio in 1961 and Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 were two highly influential court decisions.[7] Mapp v. Ohio found that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures" may not be used in criminal prosecutions. Miranda v. Arizona required that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. These decisions began to set national standards for policing.[8]

Special commissions, such as the Knapp Commission in New York City during the 1970s, have been used to bring about changes in law enforcement agencies.[9] Civilian review boards (permanent external oversight agencies) have also been used as a means for improving police accountability. Civilian review boards tend to focus on individual complaints, rather than broader organizational issues that may result in long-term improvements.[10] In addition to this, preemptive assessment evaluations can increase the potential of long-term improvement. The ability to identify police officers who are susceptible to behavioral issues and violence in high intensity situations can help leaders in law enforcement in being proactive against misconduct.[11]

In response to instances of police brutality, the United States Commission on Civil Rights suggested in 1981 that police departments enforce early intervention programs. The goal of these programs is to spot potentially risky behaviors within police departments, and to take preventative action to reduce instances of police misconduct. Although not required, many police departments have opted to adopt early prevention programs. However, the methods used to identify problematic police officers were found to be inefficient. The identifiers used often flag officers that in reality pose a minimal threat, while those that would benefit from additional oversight fly under the radar. To offset this, police departments have been using an increased number of indicators to determine risk factors.[12]

The 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act authorized the United States Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division to bring civil ("pattern or practice") suits against local law enforcement agencies, to rein in abuses and hold them accountable.[13] As a result, numerous departments have entered into consent decrees or memoranda of understanding, requiring them to make organizational reforms.[14] This approach shifts the focus from individual officers to placing focus on police organizations.

Some law enforcement agencies in the United States in the early 2000s and 2010s began to emphasize de-escalation as a method of conflict resolution and obtaining voluntary compliance. There are also emphases on community policing to build relationships and community trust in law enforcement; the evidence-based policing approach of using of data to assist with decision-making; and the importance of civilian oversight of police work. Nonetheless, instances of misconduct and brutality have continued to occur. Many proposed reforms have been put forward following the murder of George Floyd.

  1. ^ Police Reform: Applying the principles of good security sector governance to policing (PDF). DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance.
  2. ^ a b c "H.R.1280 - George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021: 117th Congress (2021-2022)".
  3. ^ Fandos, Nicholas (June 6, 2020). "Democrats to Propose Broad Bill to Target Police Misconduct and Racial Bias". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 23, 2023.
  4. ^ Raju, Clare Foran,Haley Byrd,Manu (June 25, 2020). "House approves police reform bill named in honor of George Floyd | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved January 23, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ Osborne, Deon (September 22, 2021). "George Floyd Justice in Policing Act dies; Republican Senator Tim Scott spits on Black America". The Black Wall Street Times. Retrieved January 23, 2023.
  6. ^ Rumbaut, Rubén G. & Bittner, Egon (1979). "Changing Conceptions of the Police Role: A Sociological Review". Crime and Justice. 1: 239–288. doi:10.1086/449063. S2CID 144832869.
  7. ^ Walker (2005), p. 29.
  8. ^ Walker (2005), p. 30.
  9. ^ Walker (2005), p. 20.
  10. ^ Walker (2005), p. 37.
  11. ^ "Chapter 4: Alternative Models for Police Disciplinary Procedures". www.usccr.gov. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  12. ^ Bazley, Mieczkowski & Lersch, T., T. & K.M. (2009). "Early Intervention Program Criteria: Evaluating Officer Use of Force". Justice Quarterly. 26: 107–124. doi:10.1080/07418820801989742. S2CID 143307955.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ "Department of Justice Police Misconduct Pattern or Practice Program (FAQ)". United States Department of Justice. Retrieved November 14, 2007.
  14. ^ Walker (2005), p. 5.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search