Post-war consensus

The post-war consensus, sometimes called the post-war compromise, was the economic order and social model of which the major political parties in post-war Britain shared a consensus supporting view, from the end of World War II in 1945 to the late-1970s. It ended during the governance of Conservative Party leader Margaret Thatcher. The consensus tolerated or encouraged nationalisation, strong trade unions, heavy regulation, high taxes, and an extensive welfare state.[1]

The notion of a post-war consensus covered support for a coherent package of policies that was developed in the 1930s and promised during the Second World War, focused on a mixed economy, Keynesianism, and a broad welfare state.[2] Historians have debated the timing of the weakening and collapse of the consensus, including whether it ended before Thatcherism arrived with the 1979 United Kingdom general election.[3] They also suggest that the notion might not have been as widely supported as some claim, and that the word consensus might be inaccurate to describe the period. There is debate as to whether a postwar consensus ever really existed.[4] Embedded liberalism has been applied to describe the post-war consensus on a global stage, around the same period from World War II to the crisis of the 1970s, and contrast it with the paradigm shift led by neoliberalism that followed.[5]

  1. ^ Dutton, David (1997). British Politics Since 1945: The Rise, Fall and Rebirth of Consensus (2nd ed. Blackwell).
  2. ^ Kavanagh, Dennis (1992). "The Postwar Consensus," Twentieth Century British History. 3#2 pp. 175–90.
  3. ^ Toye, Richard (2013). "From 'Consensus' to 'Common Ground': The Rhetoric of the Postwar Settlement and its Collapse," Journal of Contemporary History. 48#1 pp. 3–23.
  4. ^ Jeffreys, Kevin (1995). The Churchill Coalition and Wartime Politics, 1940-45. Manchester.
  5. ^ Cohen, Joseph Nathan; Centeno, Miguel Angel (July 2006). "Neoliberalism and Patterns of Economic Performance, 1980–2000". The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 606 (1): 32–67. doi:10.1177/0002716206288751. ISSN 0002-7162.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search