Proportionality for solid coalitions

Proportionality for solid coalitions (PSC) is a fairness criterion for ranked voting systems. It is an adaptation of the quota rule to voting systems in which there are no parties, the voters can vote directly for candidates, and voters rank individual candidates. The criterion was first proposed by the British philosopher and logician Michael Dummett.[1][2]

PSC is a weak definition of proportionality, which only guarantees proportional representation for cloned candidates, also called solid coalitions. In other words, voters must rank all candidates within the same party first (before candidates of other parties) to ensure it is adequately represented. On the other hand, PSC does not guarantee proportional representation if voters rank candidates of different parties together (as they will no longer form a solid coalition). As a result, PSC systems like the single transferable vote[3] can become disproportional if there are substantial cross-cutting cleavages.[4][5][6]

  1. ^ Dummett, M.: Voting procedures. Oxford Clarendon Press (1984).
  2. ^ D. R. Woodall: Monotonicity of single-seat preferential election rules. Discrete Applied Mathematics 77 (1997), p. 83–84.
  3. ^ Tideman, Nicolaus (1995-03-01). "The Single Transferable Vote". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9 (1): 27–38. doi:10.1257/jep.9.1.27. ISSN 0895-3309.
  4. ^ Brill, Markus; Peters, Jannik (2023). "Robust and Verifiable Proportionality Axioms for Multiwinner Voting". arXiv:2302.01989 [cs.GT].
  5. ^ Tideman N.: Collective Decisions and Voting. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot, 2006, p. 268–269.
  6. ^ Aziz, Haris; Lee, Barton (2018-06-04). "The Expanding Approvals Rule: Improving Proportional Representation and Monotonicity". arXiv:1708.07580 [cs.GT].

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search