Scientology and law

The Church of Scientology has been involved in numerous court disputes across the world. In some cases, when the Church has initiated the dispute, questions have been raised as to its motives.^[1] The Church of Scientology says that its use of the legal system is necessary to protect its intellectual property and its right to freedom of religion. Critics say that most of the organization's legal claims are designed to harass those who criticize it and its manipulative business practices.^[2]^[3]^[4]

In the years since its inception, the Church of Scientology's lawsuits have numbered in the thousands—filed against newspapers, magazines, government agencies (including the United States tax collecting unit, the IRS), and many individuals. In 1991, Time magazine estimated that the Church spends an average of about $20 million per year on various legal actions,^[5] and it is the exclusive client of several law firms. According to a U.S. District Court Memorandum of Decision in 1993, Scientologists "have abused the federal court system by using it, inter alia, to destroy their opponents, rather than to resolve an actual dispute over trademark law or any other legal matter. This constitutes 'extraordinary, malicious, wanton, and oppressive conduct.' ... It is abundantly clear that plaintiffs sought to harass the individual defendants and destroy the church defendants through massive over-litigation and other highly questionable litigation tactics. The Special Master has never seen a more glaring example of bad faith litigation than this."^[6] Rulings such as this have classified the Church of Scientology as a chronically vexatious litigant. Legal disputes initiated by Scientology against its former members, the media or others include the following:

Religious discrimination cases, including recognition as a religious organization.
Copyright infringement cases. Scientology's religious documents are copyrighted, and many are available only to members who pay for higher levels of courses and auditing.
Libel and slander cases.

In the past, the Church has been the defendant in criminal cases (for example, in United States v. Hubbard), and increasingly, lawsuits are being brought by former Church members against the Church, such as:

human trafficking and forced labor (Claire and Mark Headley v. Church of Scientology International)
fraud and misrepresentation^[7]
libel (e.g. Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto).

^ Frantz, Douglas (March 9, 1997). "An Ultra-Aggressive Use of Investigators and the Courts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2007.
^ Cite error: The named reference Offensive was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference sptimes1979 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cooper, Anderson (April 14, 2007). "Inside Scientology". Anderson Cooper 360°. CNN.
^ Cite error: The named reference behar was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ RTC v. Robin Scott, U. S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 85-711-JMI (Bx) 85-7197-JMI (Bx), January 20, 1993, Memorandum of Decision
^ Cite error: The named reference garcia-salon was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[frantz-1] Frantz, Douglas (March 9, 1997). "An Ultra-Aggressive Use of Investigators and the Courts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2007.

[Offensive-2] Cite error: The named reference Offensive was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[sptimes1979-3] Cite error: The named reference sptimes1979 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[4] Cooper, Anderson (April 14, 2007). "Inside Scientology". Anderson Cooper 360°. CNN.

[behar-5] Cite error: The named reference behar was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[6] RTC v. Robin Scott, U. S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 85-711-JMI (Bx) 85-7197-JMI (Bx), January 20, 1993, Memorandum of Decision

[garcia-salon-7] Cite error: The named reference garcia-salon was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]