Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal

Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Argued February 25, 1998
Decided May 18, 1998
Full case nameTerry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al., Petitioners v. Ramon Martinez-Villareal
Citations523 U.S. 637 (more)
118 S. Ct. 1618; 140 L. Ed. 2d 849; 1998 U.S. LEXIS 3104
Case history
PriorCertiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Holding
§2244(b) did not apply to a petition that raises only a competency to be executed claim and that respondent did not, therefore, need authorization to file his petition in the District Court.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityRehnquist, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
DissentScalia, joined by Thomas
DissentThomas, joined by Scalia

Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637 (1998), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) did not apply to a petition that raises only a competency to be executed claim and that respondent did not, therefore, need authorization to file his petition in the District Court.[1]

  1. ^ 523 U.S. 637 (1998)

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search