Talk:Cindy Aurum

Cindy Aurum has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 12, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Characters Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance). Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs HaptX (4 participants) Rustler (video game) (3 participants) Tales of Commons (5 participants) Litten, Torracat, and Incineroar (10 participants) Ilyas El Maliki (5 participants) DigitalMania (6 participants) Ratalaika Games (6 participants) Fusion Engine (5 participants) Walid Sultan Midani (3 participants; relisted) Platinum Arts Sandbox (4 participants; relisted) Allin Kempthorne (2 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Abandonware (discussion) 3D mousepad (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Yoshi's New Island (nom) Good article nominations Ayane (Dead or Alive) (start) Tetris (nom) Pokémon video game series competitive play (nom) Clutch Gaming (nom) Pokémon Trading Card Game Pocket (nom) Kaboom! (video game) (start) Donkey Kong (character) (nom) Crash Team Rumble (start) NHL Hockey (start) Ducks Ahoy! (start) Look Outside (start) Vault 101 (start) Buffy the Vampire Slayer (2002 video game) (start) Buriki One (nom) Deus Ex (video game) (start) Sonic Mega Collection (start) The King of Fighters 2000 (start) DYK nominations No did you know nominations Reviews and reassessments Kingdom Hearts (nom) Pokémon Scarlet and Violet (rev) Wario Land: Shake It — Amazing Footage! (rev) Rain World (rev) Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties (nom) Cloud9 League of Legends (nom) Haseo (rev) BioShock (nom) Articles that need... assessment (7) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (9) infoboxes (11) cover art (321) screenshots (9,143) photos (71) translation from japan (182) creation merging Square Enix Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 11:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will hit this up soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Broad in coverage. Covers multiple aspects of the subject.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. No vandalism from what I can tell.

6. Two fair use images, one CC image. The former two have proper usage rationales.

-Could you define in greater depth what a "Cid" is in the lead, aka what it does/means in the series context?

• Expanded with more info here and in the design info.

-Section looks good.

-Section looks good.

-"characters like Cindy represented the rougher edges of a title that went through a troubled development." How so?

• Fixed with a small rewrite, should hopefully be clearer.

-I feel the use of "titillate" may be confusing due to its status as a more niche word. I'd change it, though you can leave it if you feel it best.

• Put quotes around titillate as it's an exact quote, and tried to make clearer.

-Overall looks fine. I've made some touch-ups for minor fixes such as typos and such in places.

Article looks good overall. Just touch on these points and I'll be happy to pass this article.

• All should be fixed, let me know if there's anything else to tidy!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]