Thompson v. Clark

Thompson v. Clark
Argued October 12, 2021
Decided April 4, 2022
Full case nameLarry Thompson v. Pagiel Clark, et al.
Docket no.20-659
Citations596 U.S. ___ (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
MajorityKavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett
DissentAlito, joined by Thomas, Gorsuch
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Thompson v. Clark, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether a plaintiff suing for malicious prosecution must show that they were affirmatively exonerated of committing the alleged crime. The Supreme Court, in a 6–3 opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh held that no such requirement existed and that a plaintiff suing for malicious prosecution in the context of a Fourth Amendment "need only show that his prosecution ended without a conviction." Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch. Media coverage of the decision portrayed the Court's ruling as a victory for civil rights lawsuits.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search