Back حل الدولتين Arabic حل الدولتين ARZ Solució de dos estats Catalan چارەسەری دوو دەوڵەت CKB Dvoustátní řešení Czech To-stats-løsning Danish Zweistaatenlösung German Λύση των δύο κρατών (Ισραήλ-Παλαιστίνη) Greek Duŝtata solvo Esperanto Solución de dos Estados Spanish

Two-state solution

For other uses, see Two-state solution (disambiguation).
Not to be confused with Two-nation theory.

A peace movement poster: Israeli and Palestinian flags and the words peace in Arabic and Hebrew. Similar images have been used by several groups supporting a two-state solution to the conflict.
Map of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, 2011. Agreeing on acceptable borders is a major difficulty with the two-state solution.
Area C of the West Bank, controlled by Israel, in blue and red, December 2011
Part of a series on
the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Israeli–Palestinian
peace process
History
Camp David Accords1978
Madrid Conference1991
Oslo Accords1993 / 95
Hebron Protocol1997
Wye River Memorandum1998
Sharm El Sheikh Memorandum1999
Camp David Summit2000
The Clinton Parameters2000
Taba Summit2001
Road Map2003
Agreement on Movement and Access2005
Annapolis Conference2007
Mitchell-led talks2010–11
Kerry-led talks2013–14
Primary concerns
Secondary concerns
International brokers
Proposals
Projects / groups / NGOs

Two-state solution, in discussions about Israel and/or Palestine, refers to a plan, not yet agreed or implemented, to solve (part of) the Israeli–Palestinian conflicts by creating two states in that area (the former Mandatory Palestine). 57 states have expressed their desire for such a two-state plan, notably not including Israel. Germany has published its specific wishes for such 'two states': the "Palestinian state" should be "based on the 4 June 1967 borders" (West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem), Israel should possess the remaining 78% of the former mandatory Palestine. The rest of the G7 countries have also mentioned that "a Palestinian state" should be part of the plan; the other 50 countries have given no specifications. Currently (2024), there is no two-state solution-proposal being negotiated between the state of Israel and Palestinians who feel disinherited either by the mere existence of the state of Israel or by the laws and the comportment of that state. The Palestinian Authority today supports the idea of a two-state solution;[1] Israel at times has also supported the idea, but nowadays rejects the creation of a Palestinian state, arguing that it could become a radical Islamic state posing a threat to Israel.[2]

The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937.[3] In 1947, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a partition plan for Palestine, leading to the 1948 Palestine war.[4][5] As a result, Israel was established on the area the UN had proposed for the Jewish state, as well as almost 60% of the area proposed for the Arab state. Israel took control of West Jerusalem, which was meant to be part of an international zone. Transjordan took control of East Jerusalem and what became known as the West Bank, annexing it the following year. The territory which became the Gaza Strip was occupied by Egypt but never annexed. Since the 1967 Six-Day War, both the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and Gaza Strip have been militarily occupied by Israel, becoming known as the Palestinian territories.

The leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization has accepted in principle the concept of a two-state solution since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez,[clarification needed][6] having previously turned down such proposals since 1937. In 2017, Hamas announced their revised charter, which claims to accept the idea of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, but without recognising the statehood of Israel.[7] Diplomatic efforts have centred around realizing a two-state solution, starting from the failed 2000 Camp David Summit and the Clinton Parameters, followed by the Taba Summit in 2001. The failure of the Camp David summit to reach an agreed two-state solution formed the backdrop to the commencement of the Second Intifada, the violent consequences of which marked a turning point among both peoples’ attitudes.[8][9][10] A two-state solution also formed the basis of the Arab Peace Initiative, the 2006–2008 peace offer, and the 2013–14 peace talks.

The two-state solution is supported by 28 countries in Europe, the United States, the Arab League states, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, China and India.[11][12] Long-serving Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in 2015 rejected a Palestinian state.[13] He again rejected a Palestinian state in June of 2023.[14][15] Former Israeli PM’s Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert in late 2023 declared themselves supporter of either "the two-state solution"[16] or "a two-state solution".[17] Public support among Israelis and among Palestinians (measured separately) for “the concept of the two-state solution” etc. have varied between far above and far below 50%, depending partly on how the question was phrased.

The major points of contention include the specific boundaries of the two states (though most proposals are based on the 1967 lines), the status of Jerusalem, the Israeli settlements and the right of return of Palestinian refugees. Observers have described the current situation in the whole territory, with the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and blockade of the Gaza Strip, as one of de facto Israeli sovereignty.[18][19] The two-state solution is an alternative to the one-state solution and what observers consider a de facto one-state reality.[20][21][22]

  1. ^ "Palestinian Authority ready to work with an Israeli government that backs two-state solution: PM Shtayyeh". CBC News. 1 February 2024. Retrieved 3 September 2024.
  2. ^ Magid, Jacob (2024-07-18). "Knesset overwhelmingly passes motion rejecting Palestinian statehood, days before PM's US trip". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 2024-08-18.
  3. ^ Morris, Benny (2009-04-28), "The History of One-State and Two-State Solutions", One State, Two States: Resolving the Israel/Palestine Conflict, Yale University Press, pp. 28–160, doi:10.2307/j.ctt1np7rh.7, ISBN 978-0-300-15604-1, retrieved 2024-06-28
  4. ^ Sabel, Robbie, ed. (2022), "The 1947 Partition Plan", International Law and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–101, doi:10.1017/9781108762670.006, ISBN 978-1-108-48684-2, retrieved 2023-10-31
  5. ^ The Question of Palestine and the UN, "The Jewish Agency accepted the resolution despite its dissatisfaction over such matters as Jewish emigration from Europe and the territorial limits set on the proposed Jewish State."
  6. ^ Tessler, Mark A. (1994). A History of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana State University. p. 718. ISBN 978-0253208736.
  7. ^ "Hamas accepts Palestinian state with 1967 borders". Al Jazeera. 2 May 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
  8. ^ Palti, Zohar (2023-09-08). "The Implications of the Second Intifada on Israeli Views of Oslo". The Washington Institute. Retrieved 2024-04-03.
  9. ^ "Background & Overview of 2000 Camp David Summit". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved 2024-04-03.
  10. ^ "Second Intifada". Makan. Retrieved 2024-04-03. The Second Intifada starkly demonstrated the failure of years of negotiations, and marked a turning point in both internal Israeli and Palestinian politics.
  11. ^ Cite error: The named reference Canada2023 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference VdLeyen2023 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference ynet,2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ "Palestinians furious over Netanyahu claims that Israel must 'crush' statehood ambitions". The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com. 2023-07-01. Retrieved 2024-07-26.
  15. ^ "Netanyahu's call to block creation of Palestinian state sparks fury, condemnation". Arab News. 2023-06-26. Retrieved 2024-07-26.
  16. ^ Cite error: The named reference Barak2023 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ Cite error: The named reference Olmert2023 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  18. ^ Iraqi, Amjad (2021-01-12). "Why B'Tselem is calling Israel an apartheid regime, from the river to the sea". +972 Magazine. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
  19. ^ "B'Tselem (Document): A Regime of Jewish Supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This Is Apartheid". Institute for Palestine Studies. January 12, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
  20. ^ Iraqi, Amjad (2021-01-12). "Why B'Tselem is calling Israel an apartheid regime, from the river to the sea". +972 Magazine. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
  21. ^ "B'Tselem (Document): A Regime of Jewish Supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This Is Apartheid". Institute for Palestine Studies. January 12, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
  22. ^ Barnett, Michael; Brown, Nathan; Lynch, Marc; Telhami, Shibley (2023-04-14). "Israel's One-State Reality". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 102, no. 3. ISSN 0015-7120. Retrieved 2024-04-03.

Rich TVX News Network Site

Rich TVX News Network Info

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search