United States v. Mead Corp. | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued November 8, 2000 Decided June 18, 2001 | |
Full case name | United States v. Mead Corp. |
Citations | 533 U.S. 218 (more) 121 S. Ct. 2164; 150 L. Ed. 2d 292; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4492 |
Holding | |
A tariff classification is not entitled to judicial deference under the Chevron doctrine. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Souter, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Dissent | Scalia |
Laws applied | |
Customs Act | |
Superseded by | |
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo |
United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the issue of when Chevron deference should be applied. In an 8–1 majority decision, the Court determined that Chevron deference applies when Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force of law.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search