以下是近期值得維基人關心的檔案刪除事件：
- 2020年8月9日 (日) 21:58 ，有IP用戶在我討論頁留言，表示有3名支持通過港區國安法的維基用戶，實為同一人控制的用戶，當中資深用戶是真身，兩個新用戶為分身。我在2020年8月9日 (日) 22:12 詢問該IP用戶能否提供證據以免憑控誣告他人。我討論頁的下一個修改即為2020年8月10日 (一) 05:54的修改，將IP用戶的留言與我的詢問統統刪除得乾乾淨淨。而且這種刪除還不是一般的刪除，是禁止查閱的刪除，亦即IP用戶的留言無法再查閱。我仔細分析了三個用戶的活動模式，發現其中兩個用戶（一個資深用戶及一個新用戶）的活動模式十分可疑，是同一人的可能性十分高。
- 關於柳俊江在721事件中被打爆頭血流披面的圖片，2020年9月2日結束的原存废讨论中，6位維基人參與討論，討論結果為「保留」。僅僅一日後，即2020年9月3日，檔案被Wcam提交至「存廢覆核請求」，在僅憑1位維基人的提交，沒有其它用戶的討論便在9月10日將檔案刪除。
- 2020年9月10日，我被控指人身攻擊，但經查閱後，9月10日前我參與的所有的中文維基討論皆沒有提到任何特定維基人，唯一例外是我在9月7日叫另一維基用戶不要跟討論題目發起人計較，而指控我人身攻擊的正正是討論題目發起人。
- 七二一事件白衣人在警察旁邊持木指嚇拍攝者的圖片，2020年9月2日結束的原討論中87%參與討論者獲得共識保留檔案。僅兩星期後，2020年9月21日同一提刪者（e.g.「【和平至上】支持通過港區國安法」）又將檔案提交至存廢覆核請求試圖將其刪除。
- 2020年9月20日，我僅有英文與數字的用戶名稱被指控侵犯了政治人物，對封殺我的戶口開始作出準備。
- All below issues only happened on Sep. 28, 2020:
- The Wikipedian MarkH21 moved my article Separation of powers in Hong Kong to the draft page, but he didn't notify me in my talk page. If I am unaware of that, the article can be automatically deleted after a while.
- On the same day, the same Wikipedian MarkH21 moved my article Yarkand Massacre to the draft page right after I created it (i.e. 70 minutes). I was improving the article in the draft page as he arranged, but he keep disturbing me while I was editing Yarkand Massacre in the draft page, as he edited consistently while I was editing but that was only a draft page and he should give me time to do the edits. When I removed the "better source" template he saw that I added additional source, but he still claimed that I started an Edit War with him and said on my talk page that he can block me from editing.
- Also on the same day, the same Wikipedian MarkH21 saw that I've split an article 2019 November Shooting Incident in Sai Wai Ho from the original article "Timeline of the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests (November 2019)" after a discussion of 1 month. And he immediately ping a group of Wikipedians who previously tends to merging the article regarding my split.
- In the latest version of the article I contained development of the events in the past 6 months. In the last discussion in 2019, the main argument to merge the article is that there will be no more attention to the case after Nov., 2019. The argument at that time was wrong because there are so many new developments. Now MarkH21 removed all my edits regarding latest developments of the events, so he can simply say "there is no new development of the case let's merge the article back" because he just removed all the latest developments and he don't allow me to add them to prove that the previous argument was wrong.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search