User talk:226Trident

Just a friendly little reminder- PLEASE use edit summaries so that other editors can know exactly what you have done. According to this tool, you have not used an edit summary in the last 150 edits! (If you often forget, you can set Wikipedia to prompt you when you do not enter a summary in My Preferences) Second, you can use the "Show Preview" button to make sure that everything is the way that you want it so that you only have to save once, and so peoples' (my) Watchlists are not filled up with many entries. </rant> Thank you for your productive contributions to WP:VIRGINIA. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 02:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Number two: An article cannot be moved from B to a higher rating unless it undergoes a peer review. You changed Reston, Virginia's rating to an A from a B. I changed it back. It recently failed to be advanced to GA status. Thank you. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 03:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deeply apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused. However, I would like to point out that I did not believe that things like changing the TF North Virginia userbox required edit summaries. 226Trident (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Sweat it! Just a friendly Reminder. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== Speedy deletion declined: Ravi Vettivel == Hello 226Trident. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ravi Vettivel, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 00:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't seem to exsist outside of the wikipedia page.226Trident (talk) 00:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well that might make him a candidate for AFD, but speedy deletion is for much more clearcut cases than this. No context in particular is for "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh."" In this case we are dealing with a Sri Lankan Film Director who has directed "landmark" films, so to my mind that article has not just context but an assertion of importance. ϢereSpielChequers 08:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Walter D. Pugh. While the article was very short when you tagged it for deletion, it still identified the subject of the article. When I'm considering tagging something under A1, I read the article, then ask "what was the subject of the article?" If I can't sufficiently answer the question, I would then go ahead and tag it. In this case, it would have been "the subject of the article was Walter D. Pugh, who was a prominent architect in Oregon." An article can be less then a sentence long, yet still not fall under A1. Thanks, and keep up the great work, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]