User talk:Henitsirk

HI there,

You need to be aware of the ArbCom ruling on these articles Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education - and you may want to consider that this diff [1] is adding in a disallowed source. Really we need a source here that is non-anthroposophy based as it could be contentious about what type of religion Waldorf schools follow. Cheers Lethaniol 03:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your encouraging message. Arlene Monks wasn't identified as an anthroposophist in the article but was identified as involved in Waldorf schooling. I am now websurfing for sources that do not come from Steiner publishers. At some point it seems off to me to object that those who have ties to Waldorf or Steiners schools can be sources. By definition it would restrict "experts" to people who have no expertise because professional experience disqualifies them as experts. My understanding is that it is the independence of the publisher rather than the authorship's experience which the arbitration decided to limit. Venado 03:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Experts would be educational professionals unaffiliated with Anthroposophy or the Waldorf schools. Fred Bauder 02:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]