User talk:KeepitImpartial

See Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Inappropriate_uses_of_alternative_accounts and Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses.

I notice you have failed to explain in the case you filed on how exactly i abused the sockpuppet accounts. Merely keeping socks is not a violation of policy- pretending to be two different people to engage in a dispute on the same article or evade a block is.Rajmaan (talk) 23:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thou doth protest too much. http://en.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Christopher R. Hill &lang=en&q=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rajmaan

KeepitImpartial (talk) 11:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for checkuser would have been jettissoned if you did not provide diffs because you did not follow procedures.Rajmaan (talk) 15:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search