User talk:MegaSmike46

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations.

That's a start, but please tell us in a new request how you will better engage with the community. There also seems to have been some block evasion from looking at this page's edit history that you do not address. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations. Instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. Throughout my time on Wikipedia, I've noticed that most of my disruptions stem from my "original research" without a reliable backup. However, my lack of insight has led to many unfinished drafts and issues with others. So I'm stepping back from it. Currently, I'm planning on clearing information with TV networks.

This doesn't answer the question previously posed to you. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. So instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. I've realized that many of my disruptions were due to a lack of reliable backup, which led to several unfinished drafts. After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of other things. So I didn't respond for several days offsite. So I won't be making as many drafts or "major edits" to avoid those discussions in the first place. The block evasion likely has something to do with the IP address as I even tried deleting this account at some point. So finally I decided to rectify this matter. I'm sorry.

You've been evading your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. So instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. I've realized that many of my disruptions were due to a lack of reliable backup, which led to several unfinished drafts. After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of other things. So I didn't respond for several days offsite. So I won't be making as many drafts or "major edits" to avoid those discussions in the first place. Despite my blocked IP address, I continued making lesser edits and became carried away, thinking I could help. The evasion is likely the overall result. So finally, I decided to rectify this matter. I'm sorry. MegaSmike46 (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is that you best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer, and make a fresh unblock request in 6 months time with no logged out edits or edits from other accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it is wrong, and I'm sorry I couldn't always respond to community concerns. It was to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. I will help restore articles by bringing citations of lost media. I'm mainly here to clarify things for open sources. I've read the guidelines throughout the months.

As you agree you can't always respond to community concerns, we'll have to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administers, Once again, I apologize for my unintentional disruptions on the website. At the time, I had merely started editing sites a year after making an account. The ongoing events that I'd help out and make Wikipedia a more reliable open source. However, I was not used to working in online community groups, but I wanted to help them. There are articles with few editors, such as TV network programming lists. I'm the one who contributed to those articles (e.g. Disney XD, Boomerang, Nicktoons, Cartoonito, etc.). It's been a while since the incident, and I've made embarrassing mistakes and even violated some terms by using other accounts for fun. I felt no one else would have edited those articles had I not stepped in (e.g. the Disney Junior (block) programming list). I understand watchers have often found my edits disruptive before and the trust may be lost. After seeing more participants, I've learned the need to be a team player regardless. Many users have more experience with this website than me and understand Wikipedia is not a blog. I do not enjoy joining controversies, but I promise to contribute to the community's responsibility/cite concerns. Please give me another chance. MegaSmike46 (talk) 01:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In general I am a great believer in giving blocked editors another chance, but unfortunately this time I don't see any possibility of doing so. I couldn't unblock you myself even if I wanted to, because this is a CheckUser block, and I am not a CheckUser. I could contact a CheckUser and suggest an unblock, or just leave the request open on the chance that a CheckUser will come along and lift the block, but I really think either of those would have about as much chance of success as looking out of my window and waiting for a pig to fly past, for several reasons. Firstly, your unblock request doesn't really seem to indicate sufficient understanding of why you were blocked to stand much chance of being accepted; secondly, no CheckUser has seen fit to lift the block yet, although it's been open for a while; thirdly one checkuser (Yamla) has already indicated that he doesn't think you should be unblocked, and the CheckUser who placed the block has not responded in several days since being alerted to this request; fourthly Yamla has stated that you have evaded your block within the last six months. Your best chance is to wait until at least six months since the last time you evaded the block, and then post an unblock request which both shows a clear understanding of the original reasons for the block and also addresses the issue of block-evasion. In order for such an unblock request to have any reasonable chance of success I strongly recommend re-reading the guide to appealing blocks. JBW (talk) 15:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]