Valin v Langlois

Valin v Langlois
Valin v Langlois concerned a disputed election to the Parliament of Canada in 1878
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Full case nameControverted Election of the County of Montmorency: P.V. Valin and Jean Langlois
DecidedOctober 28, 1879
Citations(1879), 3 SCR 1
Case history
Appealed fromLanglois v Valin (Montmorency Case) (1879), 5 QLR 1 (Que. SC)
Appealed toJudicial Committee of the Privy Council
Subsequent actionsJudicial Committee dismissed application for leave to appeal; Superior Court declared seat declared vacant
Court membership
Judges sittingRitchie C.J.
Fournier
Henry
Taschereau
Gwynne
Keywords
Constitutional law; federal election law; superior court jurisdiction
Valin v Langlois
The Judicial Committee declined leave to appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada
CourtJudicial Committee of the Privy Council
Full case namePierre Vincent Valin v Jean Langlois
DecidedDecember 13, 1879
Citation(1879-80) 5 App. Cas. 115, [1879] UKPC 68 (PC)
Case history
Appealed fromValin v Langlois (1879), 3 SCR 1
Subsequent actionSeat declared vacant by the Superior Court
Court membership
Judges sittingLord Selborne
Sir James W. Colville
Sir Barnes Peacock
Sir Montague E. Smith
Sir Robert P. Collier
Case opinions
Leave to appeal denied
Decision byLord Selbourne
Keywords
Constitutional law; federal elections; jurisdiction of superior courts

Valin v Langlois is a Canadian constitutional law decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, concerning the jurisdiction of the federal Parliament over federal elections, as well as the constitutional jurisdiction of the provincial superior courts. The Court held that the Parliament of Canada has sole jurisdiction to enact laws regulating federal elections, including provisions for controverted elections. The Court also held that the provincial superior courts have general jurisdiction over questions of federal and provincial law, and that Parliament could give provincial courts jurisdiction to apply federal laws.

The case arose from a controverted federal election in 1878, in the Quebec riding of Montmorency. Pierre-Vincent Valin was declared the successful candidate, but his election was challenged by his opponent, Jean Langlois, in the Superior Court of Quebec under the Dominion Controverted Elections Act, 1874.

On appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the constitutionality of the law. Valin then tried to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the court of last resort for Canada within the British Empire. The Judicial Committee denied leave to appeal, leaving the Supreme Court decision as the governing statement of the law.

The Supreme Court of Canada continues to cite its decision in Valin v Langlois as the foundational case with respect to the jurisdiction of provincial superior courts, as well as with regard to Parliament's jurisdiction over federal elections. It is also cited for this purpose in texts on Canadian constitutional law.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search