![]() | This page is part of a guide for people who are parties to an ArbCom case. Please see the Arbitration Policy and the Arbitration Committee's Procedures for authoritative information. This page is maintained by members of the Arbitration Committee and their Clerks. Editing requires considerable forethought and usually (for major changes) arbitrator agreement. |
Introduction to ArbCom for parties | The case request | Introduction to cases | Evidence phase | Workshop and analysis phase | Proposed decision | Final decision and afterwards |
---|
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Once the voting on the proposed decision has a majority, a clerk will usually leave a comment in the implementation notes section of the proposed decision page, indicating which proposals pass and fail and the interpretation of any conditional votes on alternative proposals.
When the arbitrators are satisfied that the final decision reflects the consensus of the committee, an arbitrator will make a motion to close the case. The motion to close phase allows the arbitrators a final opportunity to review the case and the voting, to make sure that any conditional votes have been interpreted correctly and that the outcome of the case reflects their intent. Arbitrators may object to closing a case if they feel the decision is not clear, the interpretation is not correct, or to allow time for other arbitrators to cast their votes.
Cases will be closed by the clerks after the fourth net vote to close is made, but no sooner than 24 hours after the motion to close is made.
The decision will be published to the talk pages of the participants, to the Administrators' noticeboard, and to the Arbitration noticeboard. Any remedies (blocks, bans, article or editorial restrictions) will take effect at that time.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search