![]() | Any user reverting an edit of a member of the Arbitration Committee, or its clerks, will be blocked for a period to be determined by the clerks and/or Committee. This is to be considered a blanket warning to that effect. Daniel (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC) |
![]() | This page is the workshop for the date linking arbitration case. If you are interested in participating in a poll regarding date linking which should deal with all the content issues, please see Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll. |
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators and clerks may edit, for voting, clarification as well as implementation purposes.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search