Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
CategoryList (sorting)
ShowcaseParticipants
ApplyBy subject
Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives

Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


May 28[edit]

08:57, 28 May 2024 review of submission by BrianRasmussen[edit]

Hi. I want to have this draft deleted since it is difficult for me to improve the article further more. The person is definitely notable on his own in Denmark (he is even more known and recognized than his fellow band colleague Claus Asmussen) but I cannot get more relevant sources about his merits. Best, -- BrianRasmussen (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BrianRasmussen I've tagged the draft for speedy deletion. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 08:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:13, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Mehdiaic[edit]

I'm new to wiki. Please Guide me how can I do this? Mehdiaic (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehdiaic: this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further.
Do you have some kind of external relationship with this organisation? I see that this was queried on your talk page, and you responded by promising to disclose any conflicts of interest, but I don't see any actual disclosure anywhere. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:07, 28 May 2024 review of submission by BeenaMehta[edit]

Hi, I am having some issues writing a topic. I am new to Wikipedia so I need help editing the topic I have submitted. Please I request you to consider my points and help me with this. It would be a great help. Thank you, BeenaMehta (talk) 11:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeenaMehta: the decline notice gives details of why this was declined. Please study it carefully. If after that you have specific questions, come back here. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:01, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Rinuverse[edit]

Help me out about Draft to Publish it Rinuverse (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rinuverse: what help do you require? The decline notice and the accompanying comments tell you what you need to do. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ya means this movie is releasing on 31 may 2024 for it is stay in my draft or will delete? Rinuverse (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rinuverse: I'm not quite sure what your question is, so I'll answer what I think you're asking. A declined draft will stay in the draft space for at least six months, and more or less indefinitely if it is edited at least occasionally. So if you're unable to find sources to show that this unreleased film is yet notable, then waiting until after its release may be a good idea, in anticipation of more and better sources appearing then. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for understanding my issue and helped me out. Rinuverse (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:28, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Bvedavyas2024[edit]

Please clearly mention the unreferenced sections Bvedavyas2024 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bvedavyas2024: I'm not sure why you're asking, given that this draft was rejected for lack of notability, but at least the 'Early life and education' section is entirely unreferenced. Also, a lot of this is allegedly supported by election reports, some of which cannot be verified, leaving those sections also unsupported.
I must also ask you, did you ever get around to reading the message I posted on your talk page more than three months ago about autobiographies, and why we strongly advise against creating one? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
made all changes along with references please verify and live the article Bvedavyas2024 (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bvedavyas2024: I think I'll have to leave it for someone else to deal with you, as this is going nowhere. You seem to have a habit of issuing orders, then disappearing, until you resurface somewhere else. It's very difficult to build dialogue with someone who does that.
But for the future benefit of other help desk hosts:
  1. Can you confirm whether or not you've read and understood WP:AUTOBIO?
  2. Do you understand that rejected drafts can no longer be submitted?
-- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:39, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Martin.hennerfors[edit]

Hello

This page have been updated a bit since the last review/comment. It follows the same reference/sources as all the other WK League seasons and if we cant accept the 2024 seasons all the others need to be deleted to follow a red line/the same logics. Martin.hennerfors (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the page should have been the draft-page, see Draft:2024_WK_League Martin.hennerfors (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Martin.hennerfors: you don't ask a question, but this draft has been submitted and is pending review. (And no, existing articles would not need to be deleted, even if this one gets declined or rejected.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:51, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Jazibrands[edit]

my page keeps getting met back with resistance when there are far more companies that do not have valid Wikipedia pages. candyfunhouse is the same business type as dylans candy bar and they have a wiki page. can someone please help edit the page so I can have it posted. Jazibrands (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jazibrands Please let us know of any companies that you feel do not have articles showing them to pass WP:NCORP We clean Wikipedia as assiduously as possible, but poor articles exist a-plenty.
No precedent is ever set by any article for any other. If it were we would have a brutally fast descent into idiocracy
Please also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
Now, you have work to do. Please go to it with a will. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jazibrands: see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; it doesn't matter what other articles may be out there, this draft has to stand on its own legs. And no, we won't get involved in co-editing here at the help desk at the best of times, and certainly not in the case of a paid editor whose job is to edit this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As you are the marketing associate at CandyFunHouse, I doubt you are going to find anyone here to help you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draft deleted, user blocked 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:12, 28 May 2024 review of submission by 97.144.121.141[edit]

We've included a lot of sources and citations of published materials about IndexNow. Need assistance clarifying what more is required? This is a digital entity like Sitemaps... 97.144.121.141 (talk) 18:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links. There should be no links pointing to external sources until those in the 'References' section (with the exception of one optional link in any infobox).
We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.
You have two conflicting reference schemes.
It is impossible to review this if submitted in this form. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:12, 28 May 2024 review of submission by MASTERBING21[edit]

Hi there, I am working to try submitting my article "Chatham, Ontario" for submission, but I need a little help making it good for submission, is that possible? I also was told that the article already existed as "Chatham-Kent" but Chatham is a city in a county known as Chatham-Kent.

Have a amazing day! MASTERBING21 (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MASTERBING21 I reinforce the firm suggestion that you merge this with Chatham-Kent instead and thus improve that article 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21:15, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Neer1al[edit]

I have included resources about the Macomb Symphony Orchestra.

Multiple newspaper resources and proof of existence. There are no awards to speak of other than the Detroit Music Awards nominations. This is a regional symphony that isn't in the news very often. Not sure how entities/organizations like this document history on a larger scale if any mention in a newspaper is considered trivial. It may be trivial to some but is a bigger deal to others. Neer1al (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Existence is not our inclusion criteria, see also Alan Smithee. Refer to my /Decode subpage (linked in my signature as "critiques"):
Do you have any offline sources (books, newspaper articles) that discuss MSO in any depth? Sources need not be online (and given this was founded in the mid-70's I'd expect there to be at least some offline sources). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 21:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 28 May 2024 review of submission by VWellsMicro[edit]

Thank you for reviewing our page. We have reviewed other similar pages (Bing Webmaster Tools, Sitemaps) and both have fewer references from most of the same sources. One of our categorizations does appear to be under math and science, this is not correct. Could this incorrect categorization be a reason why we are having difficulties? IndexNow is a digital search engine optimization protocol (IndexNow.org) similar to sitemaps developed by Google, which does have a Wikipedia. Can you make some suggestions how we can correct the issues you are seeing? VWellsMicro (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:34, 28 May 2024 review of submission by Mendellapine[edit]

this is my grandmother and she self sacraficed herself for her religion and i want to post it but i dont know why i cant Mendellapine (talk) 23:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mendellapine: Because you lack the sources to support an article on her. We do not host memorial pages.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search