Back Wikiprojekt:Sortowanie stubów/Odkryte zalążki Polish

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria (all)

This pages recreates the old Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria page. The original has now been split into two subpages:

These pages are transcluded into this page. Please do not add discussions on this page directly! Use the section edit links or the links given above and again before the transcluded sections.

Below is the transclusion of Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals (edit)

Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

[edit]

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub article you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub templates and categories; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

[edit]

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, June 2025

[edit]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit]

Another German geography stub proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hesse geography stubs is looking a bit chubby; I propose making Hesse mountain stubs ({{Hesse-mountain-stub}}) for 114 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baden-Württemberg mountain stubs ({{BadenWürttemberg-mountain-stub}}) should likewise be created for 132 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:56, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again support follows precedant Waacstats (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Create Rhineland-Palatinate river stubs for {{RhinelandPalatinate-river-stub}}, making it a subcat of Rhineland-Palatinate geography stubs and Germany river stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Follows precedent. Waacstats (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alabama Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category over the 700 mark, I propose splitting this up by county template with the counties grouped as per Category:Alabama geography stubs. I have run out of energy for typing them up, so if anyone wants them all typed up, tough, honestly I will have them here before I start but just look at the geo cat for now. Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Idaho Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 700, we don't have a decent split of the geo category, in fact we need to look at getting rid of some undersize county categories at some point. I propose templates for the counties and then see if between the geos and the NRHP we can come up with some regions to use.Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, I propose splitting by county templates grouped per the geography stubs. It seems a bit overkill but... Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs - {{GeorgiaUS-NRHP-stub}}

Atlanta Metropolitan Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BarrowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BartowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ButtsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CarrollCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CherokeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CobbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CowetaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DawsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DeKalbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DouglasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FayetteCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ForsythCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FultonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GwinnettCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HaralsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HeardCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{NewtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PauldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PickensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PolkCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RockdaleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SpaldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WaltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Central Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BaldwinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BibbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BleckleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CrawfordCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DodgeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HoustonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JonesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LaurensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MonroeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PeachCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PulaskiCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PutnamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaylorCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TwiggsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UpsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Central Savannah River Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BurkeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColumbiaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlascockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HancockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffersonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JenkinsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LincolnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McDuffieCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RichmondCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaliaferroCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WarrenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WashingtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Coastal Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BryanCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BullochCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CandlerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChathamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EffinghamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EvansCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LibertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LongCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McIntoshCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ScrevenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TatnallCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

North Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{CatoosaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChattoogaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DadeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FanninCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FloydCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GilmerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GordonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HabershamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LumpkinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MurrayCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RabunCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{StephensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TownsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UnionCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WalkerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Southeast Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{ApplingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{AtkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BaconCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BerrienCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrantleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrooksCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CamdenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CharltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ClinchCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CoffeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CookCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EcholsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlynnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffDavisCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LanierCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LowndesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PierceCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WareCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WayneCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Southwest Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BakerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CalhounCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColquittCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DecaturCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DoughertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EarlyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GradyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MillerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MitchellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SeminoleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TerrellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ThomasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WorthCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Why do US States require so many counties?Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support idk but you gotta do what you gotta do - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian film actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Still over 600. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support gets them off the list - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oregon Registerd Historic Places stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Comfortably over 700, fortunately Portland has a very big chunk of these I propose the following:

Also if we are splitting by county may as well do the others for later ease

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Texas Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is at over 600, could do with a trim beforeir gets any bigger, unfortunatly Texas has a lot of counties. I have based this proposal on the existing split of the geo stubs. I believe all the categories will reach 60 but not sure all the templates will be required so whoever creates this (thats probably me) should only ccreate the categories as they are needed.

Texas Registered Historic Place stubs - {{Texas-NRHP-stub}}

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the third-to-last category be called "Irish baronet stubs" instead? idk - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually never mind; I still support the last three categories (they still need to be created btw) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iranian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German writer stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the folowing:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me! Please be sure to include WikiProjects - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German film actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canadian screen actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should that be Canadian screen actor, 1960s birth stubs? Her Pegship (?) 20:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it should, Good spot, thankyou. Waacstats (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian actor stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following a sort of this category that pushed the film subcat over 600, partly because unlike other countries where we have split actors we don't have an Indian screen actor stubs to put those who do film and tv, I therefore propose the following:

And because there were a number of stage performers I propose the following, it might not yet reach 60 but should do once we sort through the parent.

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yemen geography substubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yemen geography stubs is oversized; I propose these categories:

Support, that 'Amran one is going to be a pain. I feel it may be worth doing templates for all the governates so counting is easier in the future. Waacstats (talk) 07:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
West Bengal railway station stubs is oversized; I propose making a subcategory and template (Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs and {{PurbaBardhaman-railstation-stub}}) for 65 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume the category should be Purba Bardhaman district railway station stubs otherwise support. Waacstats (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you're right - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy parent category proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of Ibidionini stubs, which will be a subcat of Ibidionini and hold the categories Compsibidion stubs, Heterachthes stubs, and Tropidion stubs, which I believe have been incorrectly categorized as part of Neoibidionini stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks like the perm cats were changed back in October, probably some reorganistaion carried out. Waacstats (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Buprestidae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as Buprestidae-genera-stub.
I propose the following sub-stubs for Buprestidae stubs:

I feel there should be a dash in the template before genera otherwise Support Waacstats (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What Waacstats said. Her Pegship (?) 21:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ammonite sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Ammonite stubs (1,030) is looking extra thicc; I propose splitting it off based on taxonomy:

I think it would also help to Courtesy ping: Fadesga for this one, since he was the one who made those template redirects in the first place - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming the paleo people are happy with this Support. Waacstats (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Epidendreae sub-stubs

[edit]

Epidendreae stubs is oversized; I propose breaking the category up a little more:

Pleurothallidinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Acianthera stubs
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Support all looks good. Waacstats (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acrotaeniini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the 125 articles awaiting the new template and subcategory of Tephritinae stubs and Acrotaeniini - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well Found Support Waacstats (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, May 2025

[edit]

Niphona stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the 74 articles awaiting the new template and subcategory of Pteropliini stubs and Niphona - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good Waacstats (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

7TM receptor stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create all.
I propose making 7TM receptor stubs a subcategory of Category:Transmembrane receptor stubs (620) and 7TM receptors, as well as some sub-stubs:

G-protein coupled receptor stubs

[edit]

See here for the 271 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Olfactory receptor stubs
[edit]

This is a sub-stub of the aforementioned proposal. See here for the 327 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to work, Support Waacstats (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Sargodha District geography stubs should be created for {{Sargodha-geo-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy support fits pattern. Waacstats (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States organization stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
United States organization stubs is oversized; I propose the following templates (and subcategories when necessary):

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not necessarily against this split but I think we have already started splitting by the "actions" of the organisations and I think this might be a better way to goin the long term. Waacstats (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but someone already made {{Oregon-org-stub}} and I wanted to fit that pattern... I'm cool with it being split up either way! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also prefer the split by type/action of an org; I think the Oregon org stub is an outlier. Her Pegship (?) 21:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know! I'll leave it to @Waacstats for this one... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British writer stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Nearly oversized, could do with a good sort, a good start to that would be a new category

not all the articles in the petscan would "deserve" the screenwriter tag so a hnad sort is probable and not all would come out of the oversized category but it would be a good start to a hand sort. Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States organization stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized propose we split out the Cultural organizations. Would also be a subcat of the existing cultural organization stubs

Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support but wouldn't it also be a subcat of United States organization stubs, which I'm trying to split up? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:44, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it would be a subcat of both us-org and culture-org categories. Waacstats (talk) 12:35, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

French film actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700 800 and climbing as I sort the parent category. I propse following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Adventure film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose a split by decade with templates for any decade that can use them and categories for any that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Awami politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently in the mid 650s though I am guessing a sort through all Bangladeshi politician stubs would find more I propose a split by region as we already have a similar split for the nation, that is under-utilised. Obviously usual caveats over templates only until we have 60 articles. Please note that although I dont like the AL for Awami League this is what the existing template uses.

Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:45, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Templates are over 60 therefore I am requesting categories:

Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:45, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1950s German film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:1950s German film stubs (387) is oversized, so I propose splitting it off:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 07:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support gets another off the 600+ list. Waacstats (talk) 20:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

National Assembly of Hungary member stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as Hungary-MP-stub.
Not sure what to call this category/template (maybe {{NationalAssemblyHungary-bio-stub}}?), but the category Hungarian politician stubs is huge and I want to diffuse it somehow; see here for the articles awaiting whatever the new template/category might be... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not all, probably not even the majority, but some of the articles use MP so I would suggest {{Hungary-MP-stub}} (I had expected MNA but...) and Category:Member of the National Assembly of Hungary stubs. Waacstats (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'll get started on that... eventually... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Inorganic compound stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as metal-halide-stub.
Category:Inorganic compound stubs is oversized; I think this sub-template and category should be created to help diffuse it:

support, wish i new more about chemistry but it looks good to me, just a thought would it not be MetalHalide as we used to use the - to indicate a split and we don't have any halide stub category. Waacstats (talk) 12:19, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1940s American Western (genre) film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
1940s American film stubs is huge, and a majority of the films in that category are Westerns, so I propose making 1940s American Western (genre) film stubs a subcategory of that and 1940s Western (genre) film stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support gets it off the over 600 list and fits the established pattern. Waacstats (talk) 12:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Buryatia geography stubs subtemplates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Buryatia geography stubs (647) is a bit oversized, and the stub template has too many transclusions, so I propose making these subtemplates for the individual districts:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Novosibirsk Oblast geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing the creation of a new category; {{NovosibirskOblast-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:31, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Waacstats (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

17th-century English MP stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:17th-century English MP stubs (115) is oversized; I propose these sub-templates and categories (I might recommend more in the future):

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support along with the 14th Century one below. These have been on my list to look at but I needed a break from English MPs after the double/triple/etc stubbing nightmare of the last one I did. Waacstats (talk) 12:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to worry about the categories later and focus more on the templates, though - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Paris geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the creation of a new stub category; {{Paris-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions, and {{Paris-road-stub}} needs a more fitting parent category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suppoprt more than adequetly fits set pattern. Waacstats (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

14th-century English MP stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

This category is oversized. I propose splitting it up:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OpalYosutebito: What is "this category"? I've looked, and Category:14th century English MP stubs doesn't exist, and is moreover empty. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's always best to link it, (a) so that we can inspect it and (b) so that you can see if you made a typo. Templates like {{cl}} and {{clc}} amy be used for this, as follows: Category:14th-century English MP stubs (698) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it again, don't worry - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't put template transclusions in section headings, it screws the inward links. See MOS:HEADINGS. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot about that, sorry. Thanks for your feedback and understanding! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:40, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Greenland glacier stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Greenland-glacier-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thai volleyball biography stubs

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Sorted to below oversized but can do with some more, the following is viable though some of these articles are in already existing stub cats due to the nature of the party:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sao Paulo State geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700, we don't have perm cats for any smaller areas but List of municipalities in São Paulo gives a list of municipalities by Intermediate Regions also known as Mesoregions. I propose we use these to split the category

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

La Paz department (Bolivia) geos

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, the next down level is for provinces so I propose we split by these. There are no perm cats so I can't say which if any will pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Norwegian writers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, according to petscan nearly 300 are novelists, I think that might be picking up incorrect categories but I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American architects

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is significantly greater than 700 and could do with a trim. There doesn't seem to be any logical split through the sub-cats so I propose one of the old stand bys of century of birth along the lines of :

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Canterbury archdeacons

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is closing in on 700 articles, a couple of individual Dioceses have enough articles for there own categories but I think it would be better to split by century of birth, giving us the following, unless there are a lot hiding the first two will be template only:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Motorcycle manufacturers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Motorcycle stubs is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following category:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Christian clergy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category was just over 600 and needs a good sort however the following appear viable and Ireland would already have some sub cats.

*Irish Christian clergy stubs {{Ireland-Christian-clergy-stub}} - petscan

I would also like to propose that along with the existing Roman Catholic and Oriental Orthodox categories we add one for Anglican clergy

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the Irish category I forgot we already have subcats for Anlican clergy and RC clergy which take nearly everything. Waacstats (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following templates have surpassed the magical 60 mark and so are eligible for a category:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American painter stub categories

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

speedy support, may be a few more as I have just sorted American people stubs and moved a few articles in to these templates. Waacstats (talk) 21:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ammonite sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose breaking up Ammonite stubs into sub-templates/sub-cats:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to speak to WP:Paleo, I looked at this a month or so ago and they were looking at redoing the categorisation of articles. Waacstats (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acianthera stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Make this a subcat/subtemplate of {{Epidendreae-stub}}; there are over 110 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

deupmergers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following templates have passed 60 and could do with the attached categories:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Military units

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, this one near enough jumped off the screen as being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Punjab,_Pakistan_geography_stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700 artricles, well sorted to upmerged templates and a few by district categories, no existing templates pass 60 so I propose reorganising by Division but we will need to check the divisions will get 60

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British Columbia interior geo stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, and British Columbia mountain stubs is over 700 and fortunatly there is a big overlap, also coast geo and mountains have a large overlap and both are over 700 so I propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mine stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create Russian mine stubs.
Over 600 articles, propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't support the second one cuz there are only 59 results, but the first one looks good - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:40, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Swedish actors

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, propose the usual split of actors, usual caveat of templates first. I have not done petscan search because these tend to be unreliable for actors:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pakistan MNA's

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Members of the National Assembly of Pakistan is currently just under 700, we have split the Punjab regional parliment by party, I propose the same here. One problem is that the categorisation by party in Punjab was a bit sparse and required a hand sort, I assume the problem exists here as well as only 400 articles are in the MNA by party category. Based on that i propose the following with the usual templates first caveat:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Irish Anglican clergy stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have already split the bishops, I propose the deans follow

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s rock song stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Recently removed all the metal but still large, I propose we continue the removal with the indies going

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cacia stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Same as before; make it part of Mesosini stubs; 119 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』

Support both splits of Mesosini stubs Waacstats (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agelasta stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is oversized; I propose a subcategory for the 85 articles pertaining to Agelasta - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Frea (genus) stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are a bunch of Crossotini stubs that pertain to the frea genus; see here for the 84 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good Support.Waacstats (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Below is the transclusion of Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries (edit)

Shortcut
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category
WPSS/D Archives
2004
2005-2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012-2017



This WP:WSS subpage was for discoveries of stub templates not cleared by WikiProject Stub sorting which have been encountered on Wikipedia. It was closed down due to excessive bureaucracy and several issues that hadn't been addressed after six years. If you discover a stub that you feel should be deleted or merged, please discuss at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. For other discussions, please start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting.

Rich TVX News Network Site

Rich TVX News Network Info

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search